Dumb Cubing Challenges.

UPDATE-

I just did the 2x2 flipping dumb challenge:

Generated By csTimer on 2020-04-07
solves/total: 12/12

Time List:
1. 8.51 U F' R' F2 R' F U F' R'
2. 8.04 F R2 F' U2 R2 F' U2 F U2
3. 22.04 F U2 F U R2 U' F U2 R
4. 8.46 F' U' F2 U2 F' U2 F2 R U'
5. 7.48 F R' F2 R2 U F' R2 F' U'
6. 13.63 R' U R F' R2 U F' U R
7. 11.00 R2 U2 R F' U R2 F' U' F'
8. 5.08 U R' F' R' U2 F U' F' R
9. 15.15 F2 U F R' U2 F U' F R' U2
10. 12.68 F' U R' U' F U2 R' U R'
11. 19.16 F' R2 U F' U F U' F' R U2
12. 18.11 F' R F2 U' R U' F2 R U2

It's so dumb lmao
 
One looking a 3x3x3 solve using FMC and then executing it in one go.

It's SpeedBLD, except you don't do FMC, you'll just one-look a CFOP/other speedsolving method solve. Also, I'd like everyone to stop being like "I bet some autistic kid would be able to calculate a sub-30 HTM solution with FMC in inspection one day, so he could probably be sub-4 or 3", because anyone who says that is simply showing ignorance in what FMC is.
 
It's SpeedBLD, except you don't do FMC, you'll just one-look a CFOP/other speedsolving method solve. Also, I'd like everyone to stop being like "I bet some autistic kid would be able to calculate a sub-30 HTM solution with FMC in inspection one day, so he could probably be sub-4 or 3", because anyone who says that is simply showing ignorance in what FMC is.
I think what he meant was to do a normal FMC attempt, with cube, pencil and paper, and then when you are done speedsolve it using your FMC solution.
 
FMC solutions are so non finger-trickable because they're basically just random moves :p

Here's a 19 move solution I found in FMC recently. 19 moves is the best I have gotten for over 50 attempts, and sub-20 is considered insanely good.

Scramble: R' U' F U B2 R L' U R B R D2 L2 U2 R' F2 L U2 L F2 R' U2 B R' U' F

Final Solution: L F’ D’ R U’ R D F2 D F2 D2 R2 D’ R2 F2 R U F2 U (19)

I still cannot believe I actually did it. I was literally shaking because 19 is so good.

Now, I will speedsolve this solution.

Here is what I got, executing essentially random moves:

First try time- 4.87 s

Second try time- 3.53 s

Third try time- 3.40 s

If you're only counting the very first time, then it's 4.87, but that was pretty bad tbh. The 3.40 was a lot cleaner though.

Only counting first try, I bet someone who's better at fingertricking could get sub-4. Using multiple tries, I'd say sub-3 is definitely possible.
 
FMC solutions are so non finger-trickable because they're basically just random moves :p

Here's a 19 move solution I found in FMC recently. 19 moves is the best I have gotten for over 50 attempts, and sub-20 is considered insanely good.

Scramble: R' U' F U B2 R L' U R B R D2 L2 U2 R' F2 L U2 L F2 R' U2 B R' U' F

Final Solution: L F’ D’ R U’ R D F2 D F2 D2 R2 D’ R2 F2 R U F2 U (19)

I still cannot believe I actually did it. I was literally shaking because 19 is so good.

Now, I will speedsolve this solution.

Here is what I got, executing essentially random moves:

First try time- 4.87 s

Second try time- 3.53 s

Third try time- 3.40 s

If you're only counting the very first time, then it's 4.87, but that was pretty bad tbh. The 3.40 was a lot cleaner though.

Only counting first try, I bet someone who's better at fingertricking could get sub-4. Using multiple tries, I'd say sub-3 is definitely possible.

Yeah, you could see that in kubesolver's competition; people were executing 17-19 move solutions but after many tries getting a mo3 of high 2. Congrats on the 19!
 
He had a traumatic experience with this guy claiming to have found a XXXCross and LL skip scramble, choking an unexpected U Perm and failing to break the UWR.

Oh so basically he failed a handscramble and couldn't figure out how he scrambled it
 
Last edited:
Back
Top