Cuber's IQ

Sorry I have an IQ of 364, I don't need to answer you.

But I'll define it as the capacity for learning, reasoning, understanding. Someone's IQ might be 40 and another might be 180. One might be very uneducated and therefore didn't learn what is needed to know to answer the questions. There are homeless people (for example, their parents were very poor and the guy didn't have the same opportunities as say you or myself) that have a great brain capacity for learning and reasoning. But if it wasn't fed it won't grow, but his intelligence would (or could) be the same as the guy that got 180.

Second edit - Basically I mean knowledge isn't directly tied to intelligence. So one person might have a higher intelligence than another, but just not as educated.
 
Last edited:
But I'll define it as the capacity for learning, reasoning, understanding. Someone's IQ might be 40 and another might be 180. One might be very uneducated and therefore didn't learn what is needed to know to answer the questions. There are homeless people (for example, their parents were very poor and the guy didn't have the same opportunities as say you or myself) that have a great brain capacity for learning and reasoning. But if it wasn't fed it won't grow, but his intelligence would (or could) be the same as the guy that got 180.

1. IQ tests are designed to not test knowledge/education.
2. You don't really know what IQ 40 means, do you?
 
Imagine, people would actually like you if you dropped the whole "Sarcasm tough guy" act.

I think Stefan's points are very valid. Also, if you (read: anybody) take his "criticisms" and just accept it and learn from it, I'm sure you'll come out a better person. Stefan is quite "liked" around here by enough people to make your point invalid. The people who don't like him are people who try to argue against his logic.
 
Imagine, people would actually like you if you dropped the whole "Sarcasm tough guy" act.

But how would I entertain myself then?

And yeah, just keep avoiding the question, even though it's a simple yes/no question. If you really think IQ says "nothing" about intelligence, then your answer should simply be "yes". But I guess you've seen the follow-up question already and aren't ready to answer it.

Also, even if IQ tests don't measure intelligence at all, they can still say something about it. Just like pirates and global warning don't really have much to do with each other, and yet there's a correlation (*).

(*) I'm fairly certain that statistic is made up, but I hope you do get the point. Another example would be that Sleeping with one's shoes on is strongly correlated with waking up with a headache. Even though your shoes don't measure your head, if I see you sleeping with shoes on, there's good reason to assume you're more likely to wake up with a headache than when you sleep without your shoes on.
 
Last edited:
I have an official IQ of 124. Somehow I aced the verbal/social skills part of the test (98%). Yet, I bombed the visual/spacial skills part of the test (68%). How do I bomb the visual/spacial skills part of the test when that is Rubik's cube? Ironic in my opinion.
 
I doubt any of the internet ones are correct, I took 2 tests like 3 years ago (this guy wanted to prove he was smarter than me) and I got above 150 (for both), that can't be right. The closest to proper one I have done was the last time we had a test the nation, I got 136
 
Back
Top