Community Feedback: how can the site improve?

[Running for cube]

i personally agree with ao12, but can yall stop arguing?

That’s why I didn’t respond. I made all the points I needed to make and so did ao12.

 

[Bingus Ringus McDingus]

thats what i use. i like that it makes the site more widescreen if that makes sense

Same. If there was a way to select both UI layout and change individual colors in the color way like CSTimer, I think that would make the site more enjoyable to look at for more people.

 

[Justincubes]

Same. If there was a way to select both UI layout and change individual colors in the color way like CSTimer, I think that would make the site more enjoyable to look at for more people.

I could probably make a custom chrome extension that would let you do this, if I had the motivation - that is

 

[Gecko777]

I could probably make a custom chrome extension that would let you do this, if I had the motivation - that is

please, ill buy you vbucks

 

[OtaMota]

Is there any real reason why kids under 10 years of age would be allowed to this site? Not that I have seen any, but 8 years old is a really small age requirement.

 

[Jennah]

Is there any real reason why kids under 10 years of age would be allowed to this site? Not that I have seen any, but 8 years old is a really small age requirement.

Yeah, for privacy reasons the age limit should be 12 or 13.

 

[FenTheGoat]

A few things I think would be good
1. Being able to delete a thread without asking a mod to
2. Being able to edit profile posts

 

[AhsanDaCuber125]

Yeah, for privacy reasons the age limit should be 12 or 13.

IMO, maybe 11.
Most kids are good and responsible at that age.

 

[siwoo]

IMO, maybe 11.
Most kids are good and responsible at that age.

Bro is trying to save himself

 

[caleb_g]

i think it just depends on the kid too much to say something like 11, there gonna be some immaturity on this site wether we raise the age or not and i think we just need to be more prepared for that, including being more mature ourselves instead of just seeing immaturity in others, this would definitely include avoiding starting fights... i just see comments sometimes that, although true, are just asking for a fight and they weren't necessary at all

 

[Justincubes]

i think it just depends on the kid too much to say something like 11, there gonna be some immaturity on this site wether we raise the age or not and i think we just need to be more prepared for that, including being more mature ourselves instead of just seeing immaturity in others, this would definitely include avoiding starting fights... i just see comments sometimes that, although true, are just asking for a fight and they weren't necessary at all

Age usually does affect maturity, but correlation doesn't mean causation; there will be exceptions of course. Everyone is different, we can't just use a certain age to determine whether someone is mature or not.

 

[2x2MasterYT]

I think the Skull Emoji and the fire emoji should be added as reactions

 

[VincentCuber]

Right now the most immature things on this site are being said by a 50 year old person, so age isn’t everything. However, please, make the age requirement at least 10, but idc if it’s more.

 

[FenTheGoat]

I don’t think it matters what the age limit is. Kids can easily lie.

 

[Justincubes]

I don’t think it matters what the age limit is. Kids can easily lie.

I can't say I haven't done that before. Even if a limit was implemented, not many people would follow it. An age suggestion would probably be more appropriate, as it would be less restricting but would still imply the maturity level people should reach before using this site.

 

[HK-Speedcube]

Right now the most immature things on this site are being said by a 50 year old person, so age isn’t everything. However, please, make the age requirement at least 10, but idc if it’s more.

True, but age can be faked easily ( i mean he could say he's 50 even if he isnt)

 

[Clock_Enthusiast]

I think much of the spamming and hostility could be greatly mitigated by enabling creators of threads to block an individual from responding further. Similar to what @FenTheGoat suggested with being able to delete threads, I think that allowing users to create threads should also include maintaining them to some extent. If an individual is consistently causing problems in one thread, the creator could simply put the entire conflict to an end instantly.

 

[qwr]

I think much of the spamming and hostility could be greatly mitigated by enabling creators of threads to block an individual from responding further. Similar to what @FenTheGoat suggested with being able to delete threads, I think that allowing users to create threads should also include maintaining them to some extent. If an individual is consistently causing problems in one thread, the creator could simply put the entire conflict to an end instantly.

I'm not sure if our society's technology has advanced far enough to do that.

 

[Clock_Enthusiast]

I'm not sure if our society's technology has advanced far enough to do that.

My programming experience does not include website design (so this logic could be completely baseless), but I feel like there must be a way to control threads you create (delete thread, pause responses, etc.); essentially moderator privileges limited to a thread originating from your account, similar to how a user can currently modify thread components (e.g., titles). I'm not trying to argue with your point in any capacity, because again, it could be entirely unrealistic. Just thinking out loud.

 

[FenTheGoat]

I'm not sure if our society's technology has advanced far enough to do that.

I feel like if you can block people, you’d be able to do moderate threads too