# [WR]Chris Olson 1.71 2x2 avg5

#### Coolster01

##### Member
Lol the cameraman stated he was already current 2x2 WR holder. Nuuuuub.
Yeah, he is a nub. Someone said it was NAR but I think he didn't hear them. xD

It made me sick listening to him being upset with no single WRs.

EDIT: And sorry Chris, I didn't upload this. Just telling people there was a video on youtube.

Last edited:

#### StachuK1992

##### statue
That was literally the most annoying commentary I've ever heard.

In other news, I thought "I didn't know he only had one leg" throughout most of the video.

Great job!!

#### Weston

I remember when I thought 2.45 would never be broken.

#### Rubiks560

##### Nub

Last edited by a moderator:

#### antoineccantin

##### Member
Very nice! That inspection on the first was extremely close though.

edit: I meant second.

Last edited:

#### Rubiks560

##### Nub
Very nice! That inspection on the first was extremely close though.
On the first...? I started at like 9 seconds.

#### Stefan

##### Member
First one in the first video, i.e., actually your second solve. I think inspection was about 16.3 seconds. That's a +2.

#### Rubiks560

##### Nub
Huh. I just timed it.
I don't think I can be blamed for that. When I time it the delegate said go at 14 seconds...

#### XTowncuber

##### Member
Very nice! That inspection on the first was extremely close though.

edit: I meant second.
inb4 epic controversy.

#### kcl

##### Member
Huh. I just timed it.
I don't think I can be blamed for that. When I time it the delegate said go at 14 seconds...
Correct. I'm pretty sure since he didn't say go at the correct time it's not a +2.

#### Noahaha

##### blindmod
Yeah. Since it's the judge's fault, they can't penalize him for it.

Here's something I think about doing every comp:

Sometimes judges stop the stopwatch and reset it as soon as you put your hands on the timer. Potentially when you hear that you could just keep your hands on the timer for another 10 seconds, inspecting 5 sides of the cube, and they couldn't call you on time because the stopwatch isn't going.

#### Tim Major

##### Platinum Member
I just took two screenshots: http://i.imgur.com/u05LqXk.jpg http://i.imgur.com/CjRHkrJ.jpg
17 seconds AND 2 more for starting the timer so it's at least 18 seconds inspection.

This reminds me of Cameron coming 3rd at WC2011, uploading a video where a +2 was in it, then getting awards stripped and a new 3rd place :s

#### waffle=ijm

##### Waffo
In other news, I thought "I didn't know he only had one leg" throughout most of the video.

Great job!!
i'm not alone.
grats.

#### ottozing

##### Platinum Member
I really hope this average doesn't get changed :/ It's a shame about the 2nd solve having too long of an inspection. In all honesty though, I think the fact that the judge didn't say anything after 8 seconds should be enough to cut Chris some slack. He probably had no idea he was over inspecting due to pressure/being focused on solving and stuff (I may be wrong, and Chris can feel free to correct me). I know that I tend to zone out during official solves that I care about. That's really the only reason why he could be cut slack though. I just hope that it's enough.

#### Brest

##### Super Reconstructor
Staff member
Christopher Olson - 1.71 2x2 WR av5 - Cubetcha 2013

U' F R U' F R' F R F R2

x' y // inspection
R' F U' R U' R' U R // layer
U3 L' U2 L F' R' F2 R2 U' R' U2' // finish
View at alg.garron.us
Code:
[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	4.31	19	4.41	22	5.10	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	1.47	8	5.44	8	5.44		Face/Total	34.1%	42.1%	36.4%
Finish	2.84	11	3.87	14	4.93		Finish/Total	65.9%	57.9%	63.6%
Code:
Timer control removed

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	3.86	4.92	5.70	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time[/B]
Face	1.22	6.56	6.56		Face/Total	31.6%
Finish	2.64	4.17	5.30		Finish/Total	68.4%
U' F R U' F R' F R F R2

x' y // inspection
R' F U' R U' R' U R // layer
U U U L' U2 L F' R' F2 R2 U' R' U' U' // finish
View at alg.garron.us
U' F U F R' U2 R' F R2

y2 z // inspection
U' L' U2 R // face
R U R' F' R U R' U' R U R' U // EG1
View at alg.garron.us
Code:
[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.71	16	9.36	16	9.36	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.64	4	6.25	4	6.25		Face/Total	37.4%	25.0%	25.0%
Finish	1.07	12	11.21	12	11.21		Finish/Total	62.6%	75.0%	75.0%
Code:
Timer control removed

[B]Step	Time	htps	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.37	11.68	11.68	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time[/B]
Face	0.40	10.00	10.00		Face/Total	29.2%
Finish	0.97	12.37	12.37		Finish/Total	70.8%
R F2 R F' R F2 R2 U2

R' U R2 // face
B U' R2' F2 U' F // EG1
View at alg.garron.us
Code:
[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.68	9	5.36	9	5.36	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.62	3	4.84	3	4.84		Face/Total	36.9%	33.3%	33.3%
Finish	1.06	6	5.66	6	5.66		Finish/Total	63.1%	66.7%	66.7%
Code:
Timer control removed

[B]Step	Time	htps	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.18	7.63	7.63	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time[/B]
Face	0.31	9.68	9.68		Face/Total	26.3%
Finish	0.87	6.90	6.90		Finish/Total	73.7%
F' R F R' U2 F R' U' R

z // inspection
R' U2 R // layer
R U' R U' R' U R' F R2 F' U // CLL
View at alg.garron.us
Code:
[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.75	14	8.00	14	8.00	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.50	3	6.00	3	6.00		Face/Total	28.6%	21.4%	21.4%
Finish	1.25	11	8.80	11	8.80		Finish/Total	71.4%	78.6%	78.6%
Code:
Timer control removed

[B]Step	Time	htps	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.38	10.14	10.14	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time[/B]
Face	0.21	14.29	14.29		Face/Total	15.2%
Finish	1.17	9.40	9.40		Finish/Total	84.8%
F U2 R U R F' R2 F

z2 // inspection
U R2 // face
U' R' U R' U' R U' R' U' R2 // EG1
View at alg.garron.us
Code:
[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.47	12	8.16	12	8.16	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.53	2	3.77	2	3.77		Face/Total	36.1%	16.7%	16.7%
Finish	0.94	10	10.64	10	10.64		Finish/Total	63.9%	83.3%	83.3%
Code:
Timer control removed

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.16	10.34	10.34	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time[/B]
Face	0.30	6.67	6.67		Face/Total	25.9%
Finish	0.86	11.63	11.63		Finish/Total	74.1%
Code:
Average (removing fastest and slowest solve)

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.71	13.00	7.59	13.00	7.59	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.59	3.33	5.68	3.33	5.68		Face/Total	34.2%	25.6%	25.6%
Finish	1.13	9.67	8.58	9.67	8.58		Finish/Total	65.8%	74.4%	74.4%
Code:
Mean (5/5)

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	2.18	14.00	6.41	14.60	6.68	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.75	4.00	5.32	4.00	5.32		Face/Total	34.4%	28.6%	27.4%
Finish	1.43	10.00	6.98	10.60	7.40		Finish/Total	65.6%	71.4%	72.6%
Code:
Best from each field

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.47	9	9.36	9	9.36[/COLOR]

Face	0.50	2	6.25	2	6.25
Finish	0.94	6	11.21	6	11.21
Code:
Average (removing fastest and slowest solve)

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.31	13.00	9.92	13.00	9.92	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.31	3.33	10.87	3.33	10.87		Face/Total	23.4%	25.6%	25.6%
Finish	1.00	9.67	9.63	9.67	9.63		Finish/Total	76.6%	74.4%	74.4%
Code:
Mean (5/5)

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.79	14.00	7.82	14.60	8.16	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
Step		Time	HTM	ETM[/B]
Face	0.49	4.00	8.20	4.00	8.20		Face/Total	27.3%	28.6%	27.4%
Finish	1.30	10.00	7.68	10.60	8.14		Finish/Total	72.7%	71.4%	72.6%
Code:
Best from each field

[B]Step	Time	HTM	htps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	1.16	9	9.36	9	9.36[/COLOR]

Face	0.21	2	6.25	2	6.25
Finish	0.86	6	11.21	6	11.21

#### mitch1234

##### Member
Tim your second picture is of him starting the solve, the display has a delay so it doesn't show it but watching that section of the video multiple times I can see that his hands start the timer about 30.3-30.5 seconds into the video. The inspection does seem to be right at 15 seconds if not just slightly over 15 seconds, but surely not 17 seconds.

#### qqwref

##### Member
Yeah, misalignments are one thing, but I don't think a competitor can be held responsible for timing their inspection even to the nearest two seconds. (Open up your favorite timer, close your eyes, start the timer, and try to stop it at about 15 seconds without counting in your head. See how you do. Now try it while not looking at the timer, but instead concentrating on tracing pieces on a cube.) If the judge doesn't give the right signals or keep track of time properly, and it's still pretty close (like, 17 seconds, not 40) it's just not reasonable to hold the competitor responsible.

#### lele1415

##### Member
【4.31】
scramble：U' R' U' F R' F R' U' F R2
inspection：x' y
R' F U' R U' R' U R U3
R' F2 R F' R' F2 R2 U' R' U2

【1.71】
scramble：U' F R F R' U2 R' U F2
inspection：y2 x
U' L' U2 R
R U R' F' R U R' U' R U R' U

【1.68】
scramble：F' R F2 U2 R F' R2 U' R
R' U R2
B U' R'2 F2 U' F

【1.75】
scramble：F' R F R' U2 F R' U' R
inspection：z
R' U2 R
R U' R U' R' U R' F R2 F' U

【1.47】
scramble：R2 U' R' U' F2 R' U' R'
inspection：z2
U R2
U' R' U R' U' R U' R' U' R2