finger go brr
Regular
s'been about a year since i actually practiced
goals:
goals:
- learn 3bld
- sub 3 on 5x5
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which square-1 did you get, out of curiosity?Just received a square 1, and I solved with Tingman’s tutorial in about an hour or something. For the next few weeks I’ll probably focus more on sq 1.
Try doing the algs fasterI accidentally got addicted to 2x2, so using my terrible Qiyi Sail 2x2 and the Ortega method I did my first 2x2 ao5 in a month.
Generated By csTimer on 2022-08-07
avg of 5: 19.15
Time List:
1. 26.23 R' U2 R F R2 U2 F U' R2
2. (9.89) U' F2 U' F2 U F' U F U2 F'
3. 19.89 U' R2 U R2 F R' F U2 R2
4. (DNF(18.34)) F U R U' F' R2 U F' R2
5. 11.32 R2 U' F U2 R2 U' R' F R2 F'
Can’t believe I got my first sub 10 as the second solve lol.
Ahh ok lol I thought u were like sub30 mbwhy not? sure it's a bit slower than the big three, but i don't average 5 seconds i average 1 minute. the potential of petrus is good enough for me (some people regularly get 10 seconds with it), and i enjoy solving with it.
don't say anything about zz i've tried it and didn't like it
Using Petrus works (in fact, any normal 3×3×3 method would work), but there's an impedance mismatch: you're starting the 3×3×3 stage with the cross already solved, so you might as well make use of that and do F2L pairs.i've been practicing 4x4 a bit in the past few days. i've been using yau, and using a partial cross to make my 2x2x3 (i use petrus). just casual solves; haven't been timing. can anyone give me their thoughts on using yau for petrus (or perhaps any alternatives)? i'm a bit worried about inefficiency in 3x3 stage.
it's not exactly a cross, i'm ignoring the last cross edge and just putting any edge there. i know that it's pretty much just cfop but with eo, but i'm more used to edges oriented in last layer and petrus f2l, so that's kinda my logic there. is there any other alternatives to this though? i don't know if there's any big cube method for roux, though that'd probably work given that some people start 2x2x3 with a roux first block and expand from there.Using Petrus works (in fact, any normal 3×3×3 method would work), but there's an impedance mismatch: you're starting the 3×3×3 stage with the cross already solved, so you might as well make use of that and do F2L pairs.
For that matter, doing a Petrus solve starting with the cross already solved is pretty much going to be just that anyway. The only real difference is that you're doing EO between the second and third pairs.
There are 2 big cube petrus methods I know of:it's not exactly a cross, i'm ignoring the last cross edge and just putting any edge there. i know that it's pretty much just cfop but with eo, but i'm more used to edges oriented in last layer and petrus f2l, so that's kinda my logic there. is there any other alternatives to this though? i don't know if there's any big cube method for roux, though that'd probably work given that some people start 2x2x3 with a roux first block and expand from there.