If you learn LBL you can easily transition into CLL but learning Ortega wont help you with EG-1 or 2I was thinking about the exact same thing just yesterday after I solved in 5 seconds with LBL. I solve the 3x3 in about 30 seconds, so I was thinking that if I can get that fast, the LBL couldn't be that bad on a 2x2. If you don't have time to learn Ortega before a competition, LBL is a good alternative.
There are a lot of PLL skips, but the bad thing is that if you only get one during a competition then it doesn't help your average at all.
I'm guessing you read the first and then just assumed the second, because the second part of your statement is wrong. Transitioning from Ortega to EG is exactly the same as transitioning from LBL to CLL.If you learn LBL you can easily transition into CLL but learning Ortega wont help you with EG-1 or 2
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|[Unofficial] 4.37 LBL 2x2 avg||Puzzle Video Gallery||2|
|B||CLL,EG or LBL for 2x2||Cubing Help & Questions||4|
|LBL 2x2 tutorial.||How-to's, Guides, etc.||0|
|[Help Thread] 2x2 LBL Discussion||Cubing Help & Questions||15|
|E||[Unofficial] Yet another 2x2 average: 3.97 avg of 12 using only Ortega & LBL||Puzzle Video Gallery||9|