n0nco
Veteran
Hello! I am finally back. As I mentioned, I stopped updating for those 3 weeks because I didn't have much to talk about, and I didn't have much motivation. As I also said, I got burnt out from alg learning and completely lost my momentum, which sprouted into unhealthy and obsessive gaming... Alas, not much I can do but move forward and work on myself.
CFOP:
I was barely ever cubing, so I didn't spend time on this at all, of course, it's my fault for not balancing my focus though.
Also, the schedule isn't working out, so I'm changing it from "each day focuses on a different step", to "focus on 1 step from each method over the entire week". This week, for CFOP, I will just do some relaxed solving to ease myself back into solving with it.
2^4 Presentation:
This is a huge relief to finally be done with. There's a lot of lessons to be learnt from this, but I doubt I can extract them all. I'll try my best though.
The structure was a big thing I had to change after the mock-presentation with my parents. Previously the presentation was an incoherent mess of random demonstrated facts that barely strung together. I got the suggestion to follow the presentation structure of "This is what I'm going to talk about. The actual presentation. This is what I just told you about.", and while adding that I looked at the structure in general, as well as the order of explanations, and revised it to make it into a cohesive lesson that fed into itself. This isn't really a mistake, per se, but it's good experience for me to keep in mind. (I swapped the order of this and the following paragraph to make it flow better, so I'm already putting it into practice!)
While trying to sum up the presentation, I realised I was very confused about what I was actually trying to do with it. Explain the fourth dimension in its entirety? (Which would be accompanied by extensive learning about it.) Generally explain the cube? Something else? That was mistake number 1. I should have had a clear idea of what I wanted to do. After doing the mock presentation with my parents, and listening to their criticism, I realised I should focus mainly on intuitively explaining the cubes 4D-ness and why it looks how it does. I had to cut out quite a bit of fat, like how the cube is put together and the components of the pieces. I also realised my scope was too large: Once again, I'm not quite sure what I wanted to do, but it definitely somewhat aligned with "Learn and explain the fourth dimension and the puzzle in its near entirety, within a 15 minute presentation.", which was foolish.
Another obvious mistake is not doing it sooner. I had to rush to edit and adjust the presentation, because I did the mock-presentation the night before the real one. I should've started this project months ago, instead of procrastinating. Although, this is a more general issue with myself rather than a specific mistake.
In the end, I'm happy with how it turned out. It starts by going over 3x3x3, 2x2x2, and 4x4x4, explaining essential facts about these puzzles that helps explain the 2^4. I then reveal the 2^4, in all it's mystique, and actually start to explain it, beginning with what it actually is, proceeding to explain the fourth dimension, relating it to the virtual version, then ending off with an explanation of the transformation from 1D to 4D, which clarifies the visuals of the virtual and physical puzzle. I'm proud of the start in particular, since I feel like it provides a good basis of understanding to work with. (If anyone here cares to see what I actually wrote send me a DM and I can send it over!)
I believe the audience was interested enough and enjoyed it. Quite a few people said it was interesting, but, in particular, there was one person there who's into maths, and he seemed very pleased by the topic. He added a piece of information at the end about how, if a 2D being were to come across a 3D dent in their world, they would supposedly perceive it as the distance from the start and end of the gap being longer, which is mind-boggling... from that I realised I forgot to make comparisons between a 2D being trying to comprehend a 3D world and a 3D being trying to comprehend a 4D world, since those comparisons help quite a lot, but I think it's fine I omitted them.
I'm very pleased to be finally done with this project, it felt like it was almost "blocking up" my life, and I didn't want to start any other projects because of it. From now on, I want to focus on a project that involves more creative expression. (Perhaps making a youtube video would be fun?)
APB:
The way this went is very unfortunate. Trying to drill an algset roughly 3-4 times a day, coupled with trying to drill previous algs, is — at least personally — very exhausting. Of course, this hiatus being so long is absolutely on me. Something of note is that I wait to enact plans until after I've actually made a post here, making this a sort of anchor point... which is strange, and generally waiting for the perfect moment seems to be a big issue with the way I operate.
Trying to go back into learning LXS is pretty difficult, since I want to re-drill all those previous algs, in hopes of ensuring they're properly learnt, but it's just soooo arduous and boring to do. Perhaps I should ignore previous algs for now, and just properly learn all the corner in slot algsets. Advice would be appreciated.
1 thing I don't get is how alg learning comes so naturally to people. I feel like I'm incompetent for struggling so much and learning at such a slow pace, but I guess that's just how I am.
Properly learnt LXS algs: like... 60? Half learnt: 110.
During the burnout, I obsessively gamed and struggled to put it down, while struggling to pick up a book or cube. Both of those patterns have been quite consistent. This has a few potential indications, but the most glaring one is addiction... I'd champion myself good at dealing with these sorts of things, given it gets to a certain point, so I'm putting a couple of restrictions in place (2 hours maximum gaming, no more than an hour of it before taking care of other priorities). Obviously the hope is that these'll be enough to engage with my hobbies more healthily.
I'm also always trying new methods to better make use of my time, and last night I thought up a few promising ones, so perhaps that'll help with procrastination. But it's hard to tell on the first day of trying them out, so it's uncertain.
Feels great to finally make an update after so long. It surprisingly took me assorted time throughout the entire day to actually finish the post, so I might not be in the flow of writing once again just yet, but thats OK. See you, hopefully for real, next week.
CFOP:
I was barely ever cubing, so I didn't spend time on this at all, of course, it's my fault for not balancing my focus though.
Also, the schedule isn't working out, so I'm changing it from "each day focuses on a different step", to "focus on 1 step from each method over the entire week". This week, for CFOP, I will just do some relaxed solving to ease myself back into solving with it.
2^4 Presentation:
This is a huge relief to finally be done with. There's a lot of lessons to be learnt from this, but I doubt I can extract them all. I'll try my best though.
The structure was a big thing I had to change after the mock-presentation with my parents. Previously the presentation was an incoherent mess of random demonstrated facts that barely strung together. I got the suggestion to follow the presentation structure of "This is what I'm going to talk about. The actual presentation. This is what I just told you about.", and while adding that I looked at the structure in general, as well as the order of explanations, and revised it to make it into a cohesive lesson that fed into itself. This isn't really a mistake, per se, but it's good experience for me to keep in mind. (I swapped the order of this and the following paragraph to make it flow better, so I'm already putting it into practice!)
While trying to sum up the presentation, I realised I was very confused about what I was actually trying to do with it. Explain the fourth dimension in its entirety? (Which would be accompanied by extensive learning about it.) Generally explain the cube? Something else? That was mistake number 1. I should have had a clear idea of what I wanted to do. After doing the mock presentation with my parents, and listening to their criticism, I realised I should focus mainly on intuitively explaining the cubes 4D-ness and why it looks how it does. I had to cut out quite a bit of fat, like how the cube is put together and the components of the pieces. I also realised my scope was too large: Once again, I'm not quite sure what I wanted to do, but it definitely somewhat aligned with "Learn and explain the fourth dimension and the puzzle in its near entirety, within a 15 minute presentation.", which was foolish.
Another obvious mistake is not doing it sooner. I had to rush to edit and adjust the presentation, because I did the mock-presentation the night before the real one. I should've started this project months ago, instead of procrastinating. Although, this is a more general issue with myself rather than a specific mistake.
In the end, I'm happy with how it turned out. It starts by going over 3x3x3, 2x2x2, and 4x4x4, explaining essential facts about these puzzles that helps explain the 2^4. I then reveal the 2^4, in all it's mystique, and actually start to explain it, beginning with what it actually is, proceeding to explain the fourth dimension, relating it to the virtual version, then ending off with an explanation of the transformation from 1D to 4D, which clarifies the visuals of the virtual and physical puzzle. I'm proud of the start in particular, since I feel like it provides a good basis of understanding to work with. (If anyone here cares to see what I actually wrote send me a DM and I can send it over!)
I believe the audience was interested enough and enjoyed it. Quite a few people said it was interesting, but, in particular, there was one person there who's into maths, and he seemed very pleased by the topic. He added a piece of information at the end about how, if a 2D being were to come across a 3D dent in their world, they would supposedly perceive it as the distance from the start and end of the gap being longer, which is mind-boggling... from that I realised I forgot to make comparisons between a 2D being trying to comprehend a 3D world and a 3D being trying to comprehend a 4D world, since those comparisons help quite a lot, but I think it's fine I omitted them.
I'm very pleased to be finally done with this project, it felt like it was almost "blocking up" my life, and I didn't want to start any other projects because of it. From now on, I want to focus on a project that involves more creative expression. (Perhaps making a youtube video would be fun?)
APB:
The way this went is very unfortunate. Trying to drill an algset roughly 3-4 times a day, coupled with trying to drill previous algs, is — at least personally — very exhausting. Of course, this hiatus being so long is absolutely on me. Something of note is that I wait to enact plans until after I've actually made a post here, making this a sort of anchor point... which is strange, and generally waiting for the perfect moment seems to be a big issue with the way I operate.
Trying to go back into learning LXS is pretty difficult, since I want to re-drill all those previous algs, in hopes of ensuring they're properly learnt, but it's just soooo arduous and boring to do. Perhaps I should ignore previous algs for now, and just properly learn all the corner in slot algsets. Advice would be appreciated.
1 thing I don't get is how alg learning comes so naturally to people. I feel like I'm incompetent for struggling so much and learning at such a slow pace, but I guess that's just how I am.
Properly learnt LXS algs: like... 60? Half learnt: 110.
Unfortunately, yet again, I've failed to pick this back up. I'm on page ~15 of Electric Sheep, and have barely read much of Houses of Leaves. In the same vein as alg learning, its beyond me why I'm such a slow reader, and it's so frustrating to go from "8 pages of a 200 year old book a day" to "I can't read 2 pages of a 26 year old book without being mentally drained for the rest of the day". I'm guessing that, just like how Wuthering Heights went, with dedication and effort, I'll eventually grow into a more skilful reader, and I'll better learn to read House of Leaves itself. Another part of why this is so vexing is the fact I was able to actually read significant chunks when I first started out, but that pace has long since ground to a halt.
During the burnout, I obsessively gamed and struggled to put it down, while struggling to pick up a book or cube. Both of those patterns have been quite consistent. This has a few potential indications, but the most glaring one is addiction... I'd champion myself good at dealing with these sorts of things, given it gets to a certain point, so I'm putting a couple of restrictions in place (2 hours maximum gaming, no more than an hour of it before taking care of other priorities). Obviously the hope is that these'll be enough to engage with my hobbies more healthily.
I'm also always trying new methods to better make use of my time, and last night I thought up a few promising ones, so perhaps that'll help with procrastination. But it's hard to tell on the first day of trying them out, so it's uncertain.
Feels great to finally make an update after so long. It surprisingly took me assorted time throughout the entire day to actually finish the post, so I might not be in the flow of writing once again just yet, but thats OK. See you, hopefully for real, next week.
