ryanj92
Veteran
I feel like the title of this thread should be changed/discussion moved to a new thread...
The growing consensus seems to be that having a 'sort' filter on the WCA rankings page would be useful, but the rankings are not to be used officially (ie rank 1 for a gender does not imply NR/CR/WR for that gender, but as before the fastest time/average from anybody in that region has that title), which is not what the thread title states
The growing consensus seems to be that having a 'sort' filter on the WCA rankings page would be useful, but the rankings are not to be used officially (ie rank 1 for a gender does not imply NR/CR/WR for that gender, but as before the fastest time/average from anybody in that region has that title), which is not what the thread title states