[Unofficial] 3 cube relay 27.16

[antoineccantin]

I'm not surprised he got it, I'm surprised about the time. It's insane

21/3 = 7

 

[moralsh]

However, i will say i'm not very relieved after filming a great achievement (for me) and being told i hold de fastest (filmed) solve just because no one has tried it, as though my efforts were worthless. I'll think it twice, maybe a few times more before uploading anything next time. Thanks.

Thinking twice is always wise, however, you did nothing wrong posting that and if you really think about it, the comment wasn't that mean, just calm down a bit and keep them coming!

 

[That70sShowDude]

21/3 = 7

Time between cubes really adds up too.

 

[Stefan]

Time between cubes really adds up too.

You don't need to start/stop a timer between the cubes, though, so this could actually require *less* time than the overhead in three regular single solves.

 

[qqwref]

fshjnsfdlkjsfdsfdjlklsfkdjlk

omg this

 

[Bhargav777]

I still have the video of a sub-9 OH he got years ago

I think I sent it to him, but it was never uploaded

I've always felt his finger tricks in OH have nt been as effective as it should be, considering his times. But sub 9 on cam is insane. YUNO upload? He is nt going to flag it anyway

Soon, soon

Waiting waiting!

 

[kcl]

UWR 3 cube relay 27.16

Sorry, couldn't resist the temptation.

Spoiler

21.29

Wow, that's awesome.. I guess this could be called 'crushing'. So I was wrong.. However, averaging 9 seconds per solve across 3 cubes is nothing to laugh at. 7 seconds is just mind blowing..

 

[Tim Major]

It's actually UWR by 5 seconds, and youtube UWR by 10 seconds.

edit:

@Tim Major - 55.44, but I feel that it can be done faster.

fshjnsfdlkjsfdsfdjlklsfkdjlk

It just seems weird considering whilst you are extremely fast at both puzzles and far better than me, that you claim a 4x4 OH solve to be UWR when you're 84th and 3rd in the world in those events, and other cubers (such as Feliks with 2nd and 2nd) are faster in both events.

I was shocked by your 4x4 OH solve, it's only slightly slower than my 4x4 2H solves. But considering Feliks beat the "UWR" first try, I kind of expected that.

I think whilst I've been mean in this thread, something to learn from it is that there is no reason to state UWR. I was impressed by the 27 second 3 cube relay and the 1:05 444OH, but I immediately knew neither would be close to the fastest that other cubers have achieved (this relay even had a +2...) so why state it?

In future just say "1:05 4x4 OH". If someone says "Feliks can do it faster" than that's pathetic in the context. But when claiming a UWR, that is EXACTLY the conversation that comes to mind for most people. Aren't records meant to be competitive after all?

 

[DarioRubik]

It just seems weird considering whilst you are extremely fast at both puzzles and far better than me, that you claim a 4x4 OH solve to be UWR when you're 84th and 3rd in the world in those events, and other cubers (such as Feliks with 2nd and 2nd) are faster in both events.

I was shocked by your 4x4 OH solve, it's only slightly slower than my 4x4 2H solves. But considering Feliks beat the "UWR" first try, I kind of expected that.

I think whilst I've been mean in this thread, something to learn from it is that there is no reason to state UWR. I was impressed by the 27 second 3 cube relay and the 1:05 444OH, but I immediately knew neither would be close to the fastest that other cubers have achieved (this relay even had a +2...) so why state it?

In future just say "1:05 4x4 OH". If someone says "Feliks can do it faster" than that's pathetic in the context. But when claiming a UWR, that is EXACTLY the conversation that comes to mind for most people. Aren't records meant to be competitive after all?

I agree.

 

[rowehessler]

lets everybody just calm the f down

 

[Noahaha]

It just seems weird considering whilst you are extremely fast at both puzzles and far better than me, that you claim a 4x4 OH solve to be UWR when you're 84th and 3rd in the world in those events, and other cubers (such as Feliks with 2nd and 2nd) are faster in both events.

I was shocked by your 4x4 OH solve, it's only slightly slower than my 4x4 2H solves. But considering Feliks beat the "UWR" first try, I kind of expected that.

I think whilst I've been mean in this thread, something to learn from it is that there is no reason to state UWR. I was impressed by the 27 second 3 cube relay and the 1:05 444OH, but I immediately knew neither would be close to the fastest that other cubers have achieved (this relay even had a +2...) so why state it?

In future just say "1:05 4x4 OH". If someone says "Feliks can do it faster" than that's pathetic in the context. But when claiming a UWR, that is EXACTLY the conversation that comes to mind for most people. Aren't records meant to be competitive after all?

I think it's better to say best on YouTube. Then no one can argue with you.