The Big Cube OH UWR Thread

SirWaffle

SHJ
Joined
Sep 14, 2012
Messages
1,455
Location
South Carolina, USA
WCA ID
2013WEAV01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Hey guys! So this is a thread all about big cube OH. You can discuss big cube OH in general (like what parity algs are best, best way to turn the cube, etc) share videos, and post your times! I am hoping to gather all of the UWRs of big cube OH and storing them here so they are easy to find!


So for the record portion of this I feel there should be two categories, With table abuse and without table abuse. For short with TA, and no TA. (just as a quick way to write it at times) I think it should be this way because there is a huge difference in the two times.

Records:

(As of right now I know very few of the records so I need your guy's help to gather more!)

Table Abuse:

Puzzle, time, person, video, other info (if needed)

4x4: unknown
5x5: unknown
6x6: unknown
7x7: 7:44.63, Florian Harrer, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdBod0kAz5I,

non Table abuse.:

4x4: 1:03.58, Antoine Cantin, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQdB31bkDVM
5x5: 2:25.37, qqwref2,
6x6: 6:46.54, qqwref2,
7x7: 11:44.51, qqwref2,
8x8: 23:44.11, qqwref2


This is it so far, if anyone knows the times of more records please let me know!


Thank you guys for reading this and I hope a lot of people start to get interested in big cube OHing! :)
 
Last edited:
I think you should slightly change your criteria for the categories:

The Table Abuse would be like the 7x7 OH one, in which he really abuses the table, with the cube touching the table more than half the solve. The non Table Abuse would be like mine, where the table isn't used for turns themselves (so for re-aligning the layers), or at least not many turns, like mine.
 
I think you should slightly change your criteria for the categories:

The Table Abuse would be like the 7x7 OH one, in which he really abuses the table, with the cube touching the table more than half the solve. The non Table Abuse would be like mine, where the table isn't used for turns themselves (so for re-aligning the layers), or at least not many turns, like mine.


Okay, I changed the titles but we can still use With TA and no TA as a short way of writing it. I think if you say drop the cube by mistake that should not be considered table abuse. But if you are using it to align layers it really does save time even if it is just on a alg or 2.

edit: so if we are to change it to allow a small amount of table abuse where exactly should the line be drawn? Should it be the amount of time the cube spends on the table? How many times you hit the table? or what? I want to know your thoughts
 
Last edited:
is this just for cubic puzzles or will mega be added?

I am not sure. Maybe I can add it.

If you don't know the UWR times put your own times in until they are disproven:3

Lol, it wouldn't be very fair to do that. But I am going to be adding my 7x7 solve with No TA and counting that as UWR but I wont for the other events.
 
I remember qqwref having a 12:xx.xx 7x7 no TA.

PS: Could you move my 4x4 OH to no TA please?

Okay, if you find a vid of it I will count it.

Fine, since you used the table for such a small amount I will move it. But we NEED to come up with an exact criteria that has to be met

Edit: I also think all records have to be filmed to be counted. Do you all agree with this?
 
Last edited:
Okay, if you find a vid of it I will count it.

Fine, since you used the table for such a small amount I will move it. But we NEED to come up with an exact criteria that has to be met

Edit: I also think all record have to be filmed to be counted. Do you all agree with this?

I personally don't think they would have to be filmed. If they would, might as well change the thread title to "The Big Cube OH youtube UWR Thread".
 
[video=youtube_share;d9-uTl1sJtk]http://youtu.be/d9-uTl1sJtk[/video]


I personally don't think they would have to be filmed. If they would, might as well change the thread title to "The Big Cube OH youtube UWR Thread".

Okay, fine. But for old ones not on video please at least find a legit post or something. And for others to claim to have beaten a record we will have to ensure they are legit some how.
 
Back
Top