The Big Cube OH UWR Thread

[aashritspidey]

I dont have a video sadly. but i have people who saw me do it and well the cube wasnt in the air even for like 1 10th of a second in the solve fully on the table

aand about the zeroes thing.. I dint do it i just put 99 nad it should be centi seconds my bad

 

[Sebastien]

99000000? Shouldn't there be one more zero?

Go ahead and fix it.

aand about the zeroes thing.. I dint do it i just put 99 nad it should be centi seconds my bad

Yes.

 

[antoineccantin]

You're lucky qqwref doesn't have a 9x9 yet.

 

[Stefan]

You're lucky qqwref doesn't have a 9x9 yet.

Also...

 

[EMI]

21:14.10 first try with table abuse tho.

 

[MaikeruKonare]

There's already a thread for all big OH UWRs.

 

[notfeliks]

I did 5x5 OH once, without table abuse. It took me an hour and a half. Still regretting it.

 

[Frubix]

I did 5x5 OH once, without table abuse. It took me an hour and a half. Still regretting it.

I once did 5x5 OH in 8:43

 

[Kirjava]

lol at people saying table abuse as if it's not the correct way to do it.

 

[BillyRain]

lol at people saying table abuse as if it's not the correct way to do it.

0 Table abuse = Real man's OH

 

[AvGalen]

0 Table abuse = Real man's OH

Seems like a random equation. But intuitively it feels correct. The closest I can simplify is

0 abuse = Real man
Table = 's OH

 

[qqwref]

You're lucky qqwref doesn't have a 9x9 yet.

Of course I have a 9x9. Unfortunately it's not in the same state as me anymore :|

Anyway, I tried a proper 9x9 OH (as in, OHITA) a while back but gave up because it was taking way too long. I do have a 23:xx 8x8OH time if anyone wants to guess what my 9x9 time would be, though.

 

[Kirjava]

proper 9x9 OH

"OH with arbitrary restrictions"

 

[qqwref]

"Traditional rules OH"

 

[Tim Major]

I once did 5x5 OH in 8:43

Considering 2 months ago you took a minute and a half to do 3x3 OH and 3+ minutes to do 5x5 2H I find that unlikely.

 

[TMOY]

Why is it unlikely ? I've already gotten sub-5 5^3 OH singlesAnd I'm fast neither at 5^3 nor at OH. Considering Francisco's times in these events, a 8:43 OH 5^3 single seems pretty normal to me.

 

[Tim Major]

Why is it unlikely ? I've already gotten sub-5 5^3 OH singlesAnd I'm fast neither at 5^3 nor at OH. Considering Francisco's times in these events, a 8:43 OH 5^3 single seems pretty normal to me.

I suppose, but generally 1:30 OH solvers are doing less than one turn per second which makes me think he'd be slower at 5x5 OH.

At one point I averaged about 21 on OH and 1:55 on 5x5 I just based his solve as being unlikely based off my expectations.

 

[TMOY]

I suppose, but generally 1:30 OH solvers are doing less than one turn per second which makes me think he'd be slower at 5x5 OH.

8:43 is 523 seconds, and solving a 5^3 requires much less than 523 moves.

 

[Antonie faz fan]

I once did 5x5 OH in 8:43

I did 6.05
EDIT got 5.13 with1.10 centers

 

[tx789]

5x5 OH I got 9:23.47 with the only table abuse being in F2L it really doesn't help. That was with my v-cube. I'm going to try with my qj now.