AndreiNistal
Member
I think you should continue cuz the methods you have learned from the 2look OLL and 2look PLL will be wasted if you switch to Roux.. It's up to you, whatever you prefer. 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you should continue cuz the methods you have learned from the 2look OLL and 2look PLL will be wasted if you switch to Roux.. It's up to you, whatever you prefer.![]()
Definitely stick with Fridrich. It's the fastest method out there.
I think developed would be the appropriate word because Austin moore and Alexander Lau are pretty fast cubers and Alex achieved Sub-10 in a year which i think no CFOPer has ever achieved.Definitely stick with Fridrich. It's the fastest method out there.
lol.Not all of us...
Me also, I still learn CFOP things.I started with CFOP and had learned full PLL and some OLL when I switched to Roux. I feel like i didnt waste anything.
yeah you can average 30 moves with that method in a speedsolve.You're forgetting about Snyder 3.
I think you should continue cuz the methods you have learned from the 2look OLL and 2look PLL will be wasted if you switch to Roux.. It's up to you, whatever you prefer.![]()
zz is the best and its like fridrich without oll. i like fridrich better than roux because by using algs you dont really need to think and you can look ahead.
zz is the best and its like fridrich without oll. i like fridrich better than roux because by using algs you dont really need to think and you can look ahead.
Roux has greater potential because it's so unstructured, if you get what I mean. You have fewer limitations.
So, my question is, basically.
Should I keep on using Fridrich, or should I swap to Roux?
I'm debating which is the best method, I know Donovan seems to like Roux quite a bit and the people who use it seem to like it quite a bit, plus it looks kinda cool, so yeah.
Thoughts?
clearly snyder 3 is the fastest method.