Roux, fridrich, or zz

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not all cases can be recognized that instantly no matter who you are >_>

Have you seen faz's transition from OLL to PLL? It's too fast to be seen so you haven't.

Well still, some fingertricks are just more natural than others

I'm saying each Faz is fluent in their respective methods.

Roux - <M U>
ZZ - <R U L> etc.
CFOP - well...

What if one faz has an arm cut off, another cant remember algrithoms, and the third turns super slow and is lazy so he peels the stickers usually.

this is also beyond the argument. You said that we were "kids." Yeah. Right.

Children.
 
And some moves (fingertricks) are faster than others.

What I was looking for! =)

now lets say that these Faz's can preform everything smoothly

example
Roux - <M U>
ZZ - <R U L> etc.
CFOP - well...

Wouldn't that leave it up to movecount? Assuming all 3 Faz's are turning at the same speed.

Another good point.

Can you still say which is better?

Unfortunately, there is no Raz or Zaz. All the "Faz's" out there chose Fridrich. I guess we'll have to encourage everyone to try these methods to truly see.

your point is completely invalid to this argument and I love Sarah more than you do.

1.) Yes it is valid because you are arguing about something that has no real answer or an answer foreseeable to the near future.

2.) You are probably right.
 
nah, im good at memorizing stuff.

I guarantee that you'll quit in a few days. It takes a lot of work to be able to use that many algs fluently. As Mr. Edward said, it's much easier said than done.

Fridrich anyway . why to go learn ZZ with hell of algorithms when still records with Fridrich are faster than ZZ ?!

I'm faster than you. Why are you still cubing?

A world record was set in the 80s with a corners first method. Why did people bother to explore other methods when that method held the record?

I dont even give a care if its a lot of algrithoms, ill still memorize them.

I loled.
 
long quote

The point I'm making is that each method if given a "faz" would just be as fast as each other. Also the cuber>method.

And you have been right all along. Yet for some reason it turned into an 11 page war of pointless arguing. :p

my point exactly.

Now, look behind you.

Still your mom.

Now, look out the window and see whos peeing on your cubes.
 
long quote

The point I'm making is that each method if given a "faz" would just be as fast as each other. Also the cuber>method.

And you have been right all along. Yet for some reason it turned into an 11 page war of pointless arguing. :p

my point exactly.

Now, look behind you.

Still your mom.

Now, look out the window and see whos peeing on your cubes.

3015062728_6b27f9a6ae.jpg
 
long quote

The point I'm making is that each method if given a "faz" would just be as fast as each other. Also the cuber>method.

And you have been right all along. Yet for some reason it turned into an 11 page war of pointless arguing. :p

my point exactly.

Now, look behind you.

Still your mom.

Now, look out the window and see whos peeing on your cubes.

3015062728_6b27f9a6ae.jpg

I lol'd.
 
long quote

The point I'm making is that each method if given a "faz" would just be as fast as each other. Also the cuber>method.

And you have been right all along. Yet for some reason it turned into an 11 page war of pointless arguing. :p

my point exactly.

Now, look behind you.

Still your mom.

Now, look out the window and see whos peeing on your cubes.

Wtf...this is getting just a little offtopic :fp
 
long quote

The point I'm making is that each method if given a "faz" would just be as fast as each other. Also the cuber>method.

And you have been right all along. Yet for some reason it turned into an 11 page war of pointless arguing. :p

my point exactly.

Now, look behind you.

Still your mom.

Now, look out the window and see whos peeing on your cubes.

Wtf...this is getting just a little offtopic :fp

totally on topic wtf are you talking about?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top