OLLs and PLLs: Do you know them?

[Feryll]

I see how many people struggle with learning all of the OLL's and PLL's, and how many sub-20ers don't know full OLL, but a few 30 seconders (like me) and higher, do. I want a perspective of how many people know their algorithms for the last layer, and we can get a general idea of when it might be a good time to start learning. Most people have serious (t)issues with f2l (like me, again), but then again others still need an improvement on LL. Oh, and if there's already a thread that evaded my searches, please forgive me.

 

[antoinejobin]

OLL are hard to learn I know 13 of them. I'm concentrating on F2L and I have full PLL

 

[richardzhang]

I average low 17s and i know full PLL and 41 OLL's

 

[Zane_C]

I'm a little over 20 seconds and I use full OLL and PLL.
I was probably around 25-30 when I started learning full OLL. I thought; "what's better? Learn full OLL now and get them out of the way? or do it later and wish I had of learnt it earlier?"

 

[eastamazonantidote]

Full OLL for when I accidentally insert an F2L pair. Full PLL for when my corners orient themselves. I'm at about 23 seconds and learning ZBLL.

 

[vcuber13]

im about 22 sec and know full pll and about 20 olls (19 I think)

 

[DavidWoner]

OLL isn't that hard. There are a lot of inverse/mirror groups that make it really easy to learn. Not to mention the supersune sets.

 

[moogra]

I know around 45 OLLs, 21 PLLs, and 19-21 second average.

 

[Truncator]

I went ahead and voted full OLL and PLL, since I'll have them all learned by tomorrow.

I didn't find it difficult at all once I overcame my laziness.

 

[josmil1]

I know full OLL and full PLL and I am averaging 30-35 seconds. Now all I have to worry about is executing my OLLs and Plls faster and more efficiently and working a lot on F2L.

 

[koreancuber]

I'm on my 2 look OLL and 2 look PLL (4 algs left) and I average 24.

 

[Hyprul 9-ty2]

OLL isn't that hard. There are a lot of inverse/mirror groups that make it really easy to learn. Not to mention the supersune sets.

Hehehe, supersune

 

[AndyRoo789]

Full PLL, about 20 OLLs, and I average 25.

 

[Weston]

I started learning my OLLs when I was trying to average sub 20 and then finished learning it when I was around 15-16 seconds.
I put the last 4 awkward shapes off for a really long time.

 

[Sa967St]

I knew full OLL and PLL when I was averaging ~28 seconds.

 

[SuperNerd]

I know like, 20 something OLL's, but I use an F2L system like VH, but completely intuitive, so I then use one of the corner OLL's which I know all of, and then the PLL's, which I know all of.

15-16 second average.

 

[Drax]

very close to sub-20 consistantly and I use 2-look oll and full pll

starting to learn more olls

 

[gpt_kibutz]

I average low 17's and I don't know full OLL. I just know something like 30 cases, but I know full PLL. I learned full PLL when I was around 25 seconds. I have a friend who doesn't know full PLL (missing the two N's) and he averages around 16 seconds.

 

[Faz]

I don't know dot-sune algs.

 

[xXzaKerXx]

I got a sub-20 solve recently (AO5 was 26.xx at that time) with 2-Look OLL and a T-perm, which was really lucky, because the cross was 3/4 done and i just had to insert and adjust. I think that full OLL isn't that hard, if you are willing to devote your time for it.