• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

[WR] Feliks Zemdegs - 4x4 avg 42.01

OregonTrail

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
138
I think it's simply more correct to say his reduction phase proves that he can become even better at big cubes, and this will be interesting to se in the future!

What do Robert-Y and other big cube top players average on reduction?

This is a good point. I think Feliks should focus on his reduction times instead of 3x3 until someone beats his 3x3 avg WR. During that time he will be able to get the WR for 4x4 and 5x5.

If he gets to that point and still has all the avg WRs, then the next step is 6x6 and 7x7.
 

masterofthebass

Premium Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
3,923
Location
Denver, CO
WCA
2007COHE01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I think it's simply more correct to say his reduction phase proves that he can become even better at big cubes, and this will be interesting to se in the future!

What do Robert-Y and other big cube top players average on reduction?

This is a good point. I think Feliks should focus on his reduction times instead of 3x3 until someone beats his 3x3 avg WR. During that time he will be able to get the WR for 4x4 and 5x5.

If he gets to that point and still has all the avg WRs, then the next step is 6x6 and 7x7.

He will never have the WR for 5x5 if I have any say in the matter.
 

Dene

Premium Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
6,900
WCA
2009BEAR01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I think it's simply more correct to say his reduction phase proves that he can become even better at big cubes, and this will be interesting to se in the future!

What do Robert-Y and other big cube top players average on reduction?

This is a good point. I think Feliks should focus on his reduction times instead of 3x3 until someone beats his 3x3 avg WR. During that time he will be able to get the WR for 4x4 and 5x5.

If he gets to that point and still has all the avg WRs, then the next step is 6x6 and 7x7.

He will never have the WR for 5x5 if I have any say in the matter.

Methinks that Dan has a say in the matter >.<
 
Top