You're reply angered me to want to start arguing again but I kindly asked you to not to start it up again. My Initial reply to AhsanDaCuber125 was just a kindly reminder not to do what I did back in December.
In all fairness, it came across as incredibly hostile and it seemed as though you were putting him down and publicly shaming him for having an inquiry. I myself still partially agree with you, that getting a puzzle for free is a bit unreasonable, but the approach you took was far too inflammatory to be of any value.
Also, I'm not gonna say you're the one intentionally starting this, but the last time you came online before you scolded Ahsan was in July. And you came back with your first post being angry. Buddy, at least say "wow, Corey, your business is going well despite attempting to discourage you and end your dream the last time I talked to you" before doing the textual equivalent of yelling at someone.
Just stay out of this and don't go any further with all this stuff. I already told you once to not start it all over again.
I stay out, you stay out, and everything is well. Sounds like a deal to me.
I'm not entirely sure that a GAN RS is a good idea, mostly due to the fact that the GAN 356 M exists and is only $5 more with an identical mechanism. However, a core magnetized GAN 356 M could be a possibility, but it would feel similar to the GAN 356 Maglev (the GAN cube with the old-style mechanism and core magnets that everyone forgot about after three weeks, in case you don't remember it).OK everyone…
‘
Now let’s get back on topic fully.
@NebraskanSpeedsolver you should create a magnetized GAN RS with core magnets
Oh wait that was the Diansheng 3x3 magnetic, not Solar, and that deal ended.
Depends on what Diansheng 3x3 you're talking about. Almost all the current stickerless Diansheng 3x3's that are available everywhere are magnetic.
He means that we add core magnets to an already magnetic Diansheng 3x3, which I think could be a good idea. It's a distinct cube with a small yet enthusiastic following.
Yes and no. if you take in the price for all the material and time to glue in the magnet then yes. But logistically a puzzle like the Meilong has a low want value. So sales of it won't sell well. But it's a good cube to learn on to magnetize.
Selling to non-cubers who are interested and like Rubik’s cubes seems like a good idea to me.
Yeah but they won't really understand why all the magnet upgrades are really necessary.
Then I can explain, how it’s way better than a normal Rubik’s cube, and how it’s faster, but the problem is, selling it to people who don’t really know how to wouldn’t be a good thing, but I can teach them.
I've magnetized many a Meilong before, and I can say that they do fit. However, they are far, far, FAR too weak to make a difference or even just to feel. I recommend 4x2 N50 magnets (and don't order Amazon magnets, they are extremely weak and they suck).
Alreaght. That sounds good. But I can tell you this from experience on making a mag-core upgrade for a few puzzle like the YJ YuShi V2m, Diansheng 8x8, and the Gan MirrorM is not that easy to do. Since you'll need to make so magnet holders for the core and corner feet. There are 2 ways of doing it: Way one is designing and 3dprinting the parts like I did or use something like epoxy putty.
This is the product I was looking at: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B092MB697H/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A20HYALX66GUT&psc=1
2x1 magnet are way to small. The 4x2 are the ideal size for a 56mm 3x3. That 4x2 size is the typical size for manufactures to use.
