A Full 1LLL pdf

[Eamon]

This is a FULL 1LLL alg sheet a friend of mine made(go subscribe to his yt channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbfpdplb0KchARDQKsrpfPA)

1LLL pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10ZsfklRWIvr8sbxiA64wXjGGmau0e9WR/view

Full 1LLL contains 3915 algorithms, all listed above in the pdf, except ZBLL.

Here are some ZBLL recources: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...40FxRNewGnlo8hTHHGQbHP8Mbk/edit#gid=714524521 and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...3-TiF8MQ0RFSS30d5CUK96PoIwk/edit#gid=34031343

This pdf is very high-quality, me friend put in a lot of effort into this. Hope you enjoy!

 

[RiceMan_]

@LukasCubes would definitely like this pdf

 

[qwr]

The PDF is insane. There are so many colors - possible seizure warning lol

 

[Deleted member 55877]

What's the point of 1LLL smh

 

[Nir1213]

What's the point of 1LLL smh

to solve the cube faster in 1 step?

 

[Deleted member 55877]

to solve the cube faster in 1 step?

If someone is willing to spend THAT much effort into mastering last layer, they might as well learn PLL prediction instead of 1LLL

 

[Nir1213]

It's not much faster because of the recognition time

it would probably take 1 - 2 seconds, and then around 1.5 - 2 seconds to execute

doing the math for the average, it would be 1.5 + 1.75 = 3.25 seconds, which means it takes 3 seconds to solve ll. It could be even lower, to 2 seconds if your recog and/or execution is faster. You dont have to learn the whole thing though, i would reccomend the ones that are good to execute and not that hard to recognize.
That is pretty fast.

 

[Deleted member 55877]

it would probably take 1 - 2 seconds, and then around 1.5 - 2 seconds to execute

doing the math for the average, it would be 1.5 + 1.75 = 3.25 seconds, which means it takes 3 seconds to solve ll. It could be even lower, to 2 seconds if your recog and/or execution is faster. You dont have to learn the whole thing though, i would reccomend the ones that are good to execute and not that hard to recognize.
That is pretty fast.

Read my edited reply.

 

[Nir1213]

Read my edited reply.

pll prediction is pretty good, 1LLL is probably faster though if you are really good at execution and recog for the good cases. But for the cases you dont know you could do OLL and PLL prediction to do PLL faster.

 

[Deleted member 55877]

And mastering last layer isn't even as important as F2L. Would you rather improve by learning thousands of last layer algs? Or working on F2L lookahead and efficiency?

 

[Nir1213]

And mastering last layer isn't even as important as F2L. Would you rather improve by learning thousands of last layer algs? Or mastering F2L?

mastering f2l of course. But when you are already really good at f2l, maybe a bit improvement on ll might help. Top solvers know zbll and maybe some pure 1LLL.

 

[Deleted member 55877]

mastering f2l of course. But when you are already really good at f2l, maybe a bit improvement on ll might help. Top solvers know zbll and maybe some pure 1LLL.

ZB > 1LLL. If someone who is really good at F2L wants to improve LL and is willing to learn lots of algs, s/he should choose ZB instead. It's fewer algs and pretty much equally as fast as 1LLL.

 

[Nir1213]

ZB > 1LLL. If someone who is really good at F2L wants to improve LL and is willing to learn lots of algs, s/he should choose ZB instead. It's fewer algs and pretty much equally as fast as 1LLL.

its all a matter of choice. You dont have to learn full 1LLL, probably the useful cases, and that shouldnt be that much.

 

[Eamon]

I have both ZBLL and 1LLL put up there, imo, COLL to EPLL is faster than both of those

 

[Nir1213]

I have both ZBLL and 1LLL put up there, imo, COLL to EPLL is faster than both of those

coll has some trash algs tho. But some are good

 

[Eamon]

coll has some trash algs tho. But some are good

yes, like the 2 lines Pi case has so many gripshifts omg, but like checkers Pi is a lot better

 

[DNF_Cuber]

I have both ZBLL and 1LLL put up there, imo, COLL to EPLL is faster than both of those

How is 2 look and higher movecount better than 1 look and more efficient?

 

[Deleted member 55877]

yes, like the 2 lines Pi case has so many gripshifts omg, but like checkers Pi is a lot better

2 lines pi case is much faster than checkers

 

[Eamon]

How is 2 look and higher movecount better than 1 look and more efficient?

for some of the cases, a spesific pattern won't move or just moved by a little during the alg, so I can sometimes 1 look the last layer, even though it's trchnically 2 algs

 

[DNF_Cuber]

2 lines pi case is much faster than checkers

yes. The really bad cases are mostly Sunes and Antisunes