joey
Member
Wow, you totally missed the point of the first post.Comparing just Fridrich and Petrus (I mean the people, not the method) isn't good enough (I don't want to go into all statistical detail)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, you totally missed the point of the first post.Comparing just Fridrich and Petrus (I mean the people, not the method) isn't good enough (I don't want to go into all statistical detail)
None of it is any proof. DO you really want to do some statistical analysis to it? You know, there are also plenty of people around who use fridrich and are no where near where Lars is. Same applies to people who use Petrus too, of course. Chance of scrambles being better for one method better than the other is involved too. Comparing just Fridrich and Petrus (I mean the people, not the method) isn't good enough (I don't want to go into all statistical detail)
WC 1982 proofs corners-first is the best speedsolving method: 1st & 3th place!Really? I think Guus uses Fridrich.****TIE BREAKER****
http://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/c.php?allResults=All+Results&competitionId=WC1982
petrus wins![]()
CLL / ELL with cross F2L, not exactly Fridrich.
And at that same WC I used Fridrich for F2L, Fridrich did not!
Gus
The first prize was a plane ticket to Budapest to the first World Championship.
[...]Later in 1982, I changed my F2L system to the current system. Before, I would do the first layer and then insert two cubies from the last layer into the middle layer. I developed the algorithms and also algorithms that moved / flipped the cubies in the middle layer.
She should only be credited for creating the algorithms for every case for the FOP of CFOP. I remember reading somewhere in a post that OLL and PLL wasn't originally Fridrich's idea either.
[sarcacm]And Einstein only came up with that one crappy little equation, he was just a hack and should be discounted for making any contribution to modern science.[/sarcasm]She should only be credited for creating the algorithms for every case for the FOP of CFOP. I remember reading somewhere in a post that OLL and PLL wasn't originally Fridrich's idea either.
She should only be credited for creating the algorithms for every case for the FOP of CFOP. I remember reading somewhere in a post that OLL and PLL wasn't originally Fridrich's idea either.
Even more impressive than figuring out her algorithms without a computer, she derived many of them without even a cube:A guy was sitting next to me playing with the cube. I asked him about his system. He said: "I am using the Fridrich method." I asked with a surprise in my voice: "You actually memorized ALL algorithms?" His answer was: "No, that's too much. I know only some of them." I replied with: "Well, you need to memorize all of them otherwise you are not really utilizing its strength." He looked at me frawning and said with his mouth half open: "Yeah, so what's your system?" I answered with a big smile: "I use the Fridrich method, too, because I am Fridrich." He did not blink an eye, did not say anything and handed me his messed-up cube. I solved the cube in about 20 seconds to prove my words and we both laughed at the coincidence.
I got my hands on a primitive solving system from a Russian magazine Kvant long before I actually owned the cube. I would analyze simple moves and their action on a piece of paper, trying to figure out algorithms based on the commutator principle.
Could somebody tell me how long does it take to build the f2l with the petrus method?