What would you consider decent, fast, world class, etc. on 3x3?

that's kinda harsh tbh... 11 is "Sort of fast"?

Well someone will probably come and put in 9 as decent eventually so...



and also you but not that much

Well 15 is where I really started to feel "fast" relative to other people, and 12 is the next big barrier after 15. Next is 10. 9 (sub-10) is like the top 250 (?) in the world and the top 100 in the world are almost all sub-9.
 
Wow, I am also surprised by these numbers being much lower than I would expect.

Maybe it'is because you started much earlier than them, when a 1 minute time was still considered good.

Mine:
Sup-18.72: noob
=18.72: super-duper-hyper-fast
Sub-18-72: cheater
:p

(SCNR)
 
I hear that people that are inexperienced at something tend to think there better than they actually are. However, people that are Highly experienced with that same something tend to think they're not as good as they actually are. Its some psychological effect or something.
 
who the heck put 900 for all of them?
I'm deleting that entry because, let's be honest, no one (except maybe someone who has never heard of cubing) would think that 15 minutes is world class.

Someone probs mis-typed 9000, as in the Over 9000 meme, which is annoying. I posted a global averages Google form where someone put all their results as 6.25. :/ Anyway, I went way too specific, but it was around 28/21/17/11/8.
 
Someone probs mis-typed 9000, as in the Over 9000 meme, which is annoying. I posted a global averages Google form where someone put all their results as 6.25. :/ Anyway, I went way too specific, but it was around 28/21/17/11/8.

haha I thought yours was like something coming from the WCA data, like for instance top 15000/10000/5000/1000/100 or something.
 
who the heck put 900 for all of them?
I'm deleting that entry because, let's be honest, no one (except maybe someone who has never heard of cubing) would think that 15 minutes is world class.

you just ruined your statistic by arbitrarily discounting a valid submission.
 
lol so if I asked people how fast they can run 100 meters and they say 0.3 seconds, I should count that?

if you wanted sprinting statistics, you would time people.

here, you are polling opinion. every submission is a valid opinion, even if it's not numeric.
 
if you wanted sprinting statistics, you would time people.

here, you are polling opinion. every submission is a valid opinion, even if it's not numeric.

however in this case it is obviously either a mistake or someone just being an idiot. Leaving it would ruin the statistic. What if I posted 1000000000000000000000000000000 for all of them, and it completely overwhelmed everything else? There's got to be a point where you just don't count them.

Edit: I'm looking for honest opinions. Find me a cuber who legitimately thinks that 15 minutes is world class, and who also thinks that world class and decent are synonyms.
 
you just ruined your statistic by arbitrarily discounting a valid submission.
How is putting 900 seconds, for decent, sort of fast, fast, really fast, and world class valid? You ask someone to give you 5 separate answers to create different divisions or classes and they give you the same answer for them all. How is that supposed to be valid? The fact that the 900 seconds was his answer in irrelevant, the fact that he used the same answer is the point.
 
Back
Top