[Unofficial] YTUWR? 10.57 Petrus avg5

mDiPalma

Veteran
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
1,533

Do you guys know of any faster? I only know of Porkynator's 10.63.

Solves 1 2 and 4 were lucky
solve 5 was typical,
and solve 3 never happened.


details:

Best Average of 5: 10.57
Best Time: 9.97
Worst Time: 14.79
Standard Deviation: 0.5 (4.4%)

1. (9.97) D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L
2. 10.21 L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2
3. (14.79) D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L
4. 11.22 F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2
5. 10.27 B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

reconstructions:

1. D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L

z2 x
R' F' U L' U F U2 // 2x2x2 (7)
x' y2 U R' F U R y L U L2 U' L // eo3x2x2 (10)
y' R' U R U2 R' U2 R U R' U2 R' U R U' R' U' R // F2L im bad (17)
U R U2 R' U' R U' R' // sune (8)
=42 htm


2. L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2

R2 F2 y' U2 R' F2 R // 2x2x2 (6)
U' L2 y2 U2 R' U' R U' R' U R2 U2 R2 F R // eo3x2x2 (14)
y' U' R U2 R2 U2 R' U' R U' R U R' U2 R U R' // F2L (16)
r U R' U' L' U R U' // l3c (8)
=44 htm


3. D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L

moves // crap (500000)
H perm // PLL (500000)
=one million htm (but zero TPS somehow. don't ask)


4. F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2

x2 R D' U R' y R U2 R' // 2x2x2 (7)
L y2 F U2 R' U' R2 U R' U R' F R // eo3x2x2 (12)
y' U' R' U' R U' R U' R' U2 R U2 R U R U' R' // F2L (16)
U2 l' U' L U R U' r' F U // l3c (10)
=45 htm


5. B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

D U L U' R2 // 2x2x2 (5)
L U' L' R U2 R' // 3x2x2 (6)
y' F L' U L // eo (4)
y' R' U2 R U R2 U2 R2 U2 R' U2 R U' R' // f2l (13)
U2 R' U R U2 R' L' U R U' L // coll (11)
M2 U M' U2 M U M2 U // epll (8)
=47 stm


What do you guys think, is Petrus viable for sub-10?

Let me know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQF9lBRQ84k

Do you guys know of any faster? I only know of Porkynator's 10.63.

Solves 1 2 and 4 were lucky
solve 5 was typical,
and solve 3 never happened.


details:

Best Average of 5: 10.57
Best Time: 9.97
Worst Time: 14.79
Standard Deviation: 0.5 (4.4%)

1. (9.97) D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L
2. 10.21 L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2
3. (14.79) D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L
4. 11.22 F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2
5. 10.27 B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

reconstructions:

1. D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L

z2 x
R' F' U L' U F U2 // 2x2x2 (7)
x' y2 U R' F U R y' L U L2 U' L // eo3x2x2 (10)
y' R' U R U2 R' U2 R U R' U2 R' U R U' R' U' R // F2L im bad (17)
U R U2 R' U' R U' R' // sune (8)
=42 htm


2. L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2

R2 F2 y' U2 R' F2 R // 2x2x2 (6)
U' L2 y2 U2 R' U' R U' R' U R2 U2 R2 F R // eo3x2x2 (14)
y' U' R U2 R2 U2 R' U' R U' R U R' U2 R U R' // F2L (16)
r U R' U' L' U R U' // l3c (8)
=44 htm


3. D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L

moves // crap (500000)
H perm // PLL (500000)
=one million htm (but zero TPS somehow. don't ask)


4. F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2

x2 R D' U R' y R U2 R' // 2x2x2 (7)
L y2 F U2 R' U' R2 U R' U R' F R // eo3x2x2 (12)
y' U' R' U' R U' R U' R' U2 R U2 R U R U' R' // F2L (16)
U2 l' U' L U R U' r' F U // l3c (10)
=45 htm


5. B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

D U L U' R2 // 2x2x2 (5)
L U' L' R U2 R' // 3x2x2 (6)
y' F L' U L // eo (4)
y' R' U2 R U R2 U2 R2 U2 R' U2 R U' R' // f2l (13)
U2 R' U R U2 R' L' U R U' L // coll (11)
M2 U M' U2 M U M2 U // epll (8)
=47 stm


What do you guys think, is Petrus viable for sub-10?

Let me know.

I definitely know Petrus is going to be sub10 soon, you guys have awesome potential, your movecount as tps are good but in general Petrus is a hard method to get sub10 because of weirdish EO, but you seem to be pretty fast with it, it is no doubt that Petrus is viable for sub10
 
Yes it's viable (especially considering that sub-10 is far from what people get with CFOP and Roux), but why not free-FOP instead (or Petrus-ZZ meta method if you really like having your edges oriented)?
 
fast fast fast . gj!
also, this is exactly my pb with fop
also, the reconstruction for the first solve has a y' in the eo/2x3x3 stage but I think its supposed to be y
 
Last edited:
I definitely know Petrus is going to be sub10 soon, you guys have awesome potential, your movecount as tps are good but in general Petrus is a hard method to get sub10 because of weirdish EO, but you seem to be pretty fast with it, it is no doubt that Petrus is viable for sub10

yeah. if I recall, solves 2 and 4 had exactly the same EO, but I did them differently for some reason. petrus EO is really awkward at first, but you get used to it. I actually feel that Petrus EO3x2x2 is less moves than that of ZZ.

Yes it's viable (especially considering that sub-10 is far from what people get with CFOP and Roux), but why not free-FOP instead (or Petrus-ZZ meta method if you really like having your edges oriented)?

Yeah, I really like having my edges oriented because I never learned full OLL. But I don't really like Freefop+EO during the Last slot. There are so many more powerful LS techniques (speed-heise / winter variation) to waste my last slot fixing the freefop-EO.

also, the reconstruction for the first solve has a y' in the eo/2x3x3 stage but I think its supposed to be y

thanks!
 
Back
Top