• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

[Unofficial] YTUWR? 10.57 Petrus avg5

mDiPalma

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
1,536

Do you guys know of any faster? I only know of Porkynator's 10.63.

Solves 1 2 and 4 were lucky
solve 5 was typical,
and solve 3 never happened.


details:

Best Average of 5: 10.57
Best Time: 9.97
Worst Time: 14.79
Standard Deviation: 0.5 (4.4%)

1. (9.97) D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L
2. 10.21 L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2
3. (14.79) D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L
4. 11.22 F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2
5. 10.27 B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

reconstructions:

1. D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L

z2 x
R' F' U L' U F U2 // 2x2x2 (7)
x' y2 U R' F U R y L U L2 U' L // eo3x2x2 (10)
y' R' U R U2 R' U2 R U R' U2 R' U R U' R' U' R // F2L im bad (17)
U R U2 R' U' R U' R' // sune (8)
=42 htm


2. L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2

R2 F2 y' U2 R' F2 R // 2x2x2 (6)
U' L2 y2 U2 R' U' R U' R' U R2 U2 R2 F R // eo3x2x2 (14)
y' U' R U2 R2 U2 R' U' R U' R U R' U2 R U R' // F2L (16)
r U R' U' L' U R U' // l3c (8)
=44 htm


3. D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L

moves // crap (500000)
H perm // PLL (500000)
=one million htm (but zero TPS somehow. don't ask)


4. F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2

x2 R D' U R' y R U2 R' // 2x2x2 (7)
L y2 F U2 R' U' R2 U R' U R' F R // eo3x2x2 (12)
y' U' R' U' R U' R U' R' U2 R U2 R U R U' R' // F2L (16)
U2 l' U' L U R U' r' F U // l3c (10)
=45 htm


5. B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

D U L U' R2 // 2x2x2 (5)
L U' L' R U2 R' // 3x2x2 (6)
y' F L' U L // eo (4)
y' R' U2 R U R2 U2 R2 U2 R' U2 R U' R' // f2l (13)
U2 R' U R U2 R' L' U R U' L // coll (11)
M2 U M' U2 M U M2 U // epll (8)
=47 stm


What do you guys think, is Petrus viable for sub-10?

Let me know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
1,254
Location
Brooklyn, NY
WCA
2014ATTI01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQF9lBRQ84k

Do you guys know of any faster? I only know of Porkynator's 10.63.

Solves 1 2 and 4 were lucky
solve 5 was typical,
and solve 3 never happened.


details:

Best Average of 5: 10.57
Best Time: 9.97
Worst Time: 14.79
Standard Deviation: 0.5 (4.4%)

1. (9.97) D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L
2. 10.21 L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2
3. (14.79) D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L
4. 11.22 F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2
5. 10.27 B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

reconstructions:

1. D' R2 D B' L' R2 U2 B2 R' D U' L F L2 F U' R2 U2 R2 U D' R2 B' R L

z2 x
R' F' U L' U F U2 // 2x2x2 (7)
x' y2 U R' F U R y' L U L2 U' L // eo3x2x2 (10)
y' R' U R U2 R' U2 R U R' U2 R' U R U' R' U' R // F2L im bad (17)
U R U2 R' U' R U' R' // sune (8)
=42 htm


2. L2 U B U F B L R U2 R F2 L B2 L' R2 D U' F' D' R D L2 D2 B L2

R2 F2 y' U2 R' F2 R // 2x2x2 (6)
U' L2 y2 U2 R' U' R U' R' U R2 U2 R2 F R // eo3x2x2 (14)
y' U' R U2 R2 U2 R' U' R U' R U R' U2 R U R' // F2L (16)
r U R' U' L' U R U' // l3c (8)
=44 htm


3. D' L2 U R F' R2 F' U' L' F' D2 B' F' L B' U2 D B2 R' F L R' F2 R' L

moves // crap (500000)
H perm // PLL (500000)
=one million htm (but zero TPS somehow. don't ask)


4. F' L B' D2 F D2 L D2 R2 B2 D2 L' D' B' L' D2 R' U2 D' R2 U2 B' U' L2 R2

x2 R D' U R' y R U2 R' // 2x2x2 (7)
L y2 F U2 R' U' R2 U R' U R' F R // eo3x2x2 (12)
y' U' R' U' R U' R U' R' U2 R U2 R U R U' R' // F2L (16)
U2 l' U' L U R U' r' F U // l3c (10)
=45 htm


5. B' R2 F D B L2 U L B2 U L' R' U2 B F2 U' R' L B F' R L2 U2 R2 L2

D U L U' R2 // 2x2x2 (5)
L U' L' R U2 R' // 3x2x2 (6)
y' F L' U L // eo (4)
y' R' U2 R U R2 U2 R2 U2 R' U2 R U' R' // f2l (13)
U2 R' U R U2 R' L' U R U' L // coll (11)
M2 U M' U2 M U M2 U // epll (8)
=47 stm


What do you guys think, is Petrus viable for sub-10?

Let me know.
I definitely know Petrus is going to be sub10 soon, you guys have awesome potential, your movecount as tps are good but in general Petrus is a hard method to get sub10 because of weirdish EO, but you seem to be pretty fast with it, it is no doubt that Petrus is viable for sub10
 

irontwig

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
1,767
Location
Sweden
WCA
2010JERN01
YouTube
jernqvist
Yes it's viable (especially considering that sub-10 is far from what people get with CFOP and Roux), but why not free-FOP instead (or Petrus-ZZ meta method if you really like having your edges oriented)?
 

cashis

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
907
Location
louisiana
fast fast fast . gj!
also, this is exactly my pb with fop
also, the reconstruction for the first solve has a y' in the eo/2x3x3 stage but I think its supposed to be y
 
Last edited:

mDiPalma

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
1,536
I definitely know Petrus is going to be sub10 soon, you guys have awesome potential, your movecount as tps are good but in general Petrus is a hard method to get sub10 because of weirdish EO, but you seem to be pretty fast with it, it is no doubt that Petrus is viable for sub10
yeah. if I recall, solves 2 and 4 had exactly the same EO, but I did them differently for some reason. petrus EO is really awkward at first, but you get used to it. I actually feel that Petrus EO3x2x2 is less moves than that of ZZ.

Yes it's viable (especially considering that sub-10 is far from what people get with CFOP and Roux), but why not free-FOP instead (or Petrus-ZZ meta method if you really like having your edges oriented)?
Yeah, I really like having my edges oriented because I never learned full OLL. But I don't really like Freefop+EO during the Last slot. There are so many more powerful LS techniques (speed-heise / winter variation) to waste my last slot fixing the freefop-EO.

also, the reconstruction for the first solve has a y' in the eo/2x3x3 stage but I think its supposed to be y
thanks!
 
Top