Which is more consistent: Tymon or Max?

[Imsoosm]

So I've been looking at Tymon's and Max's recent results at each competition for 3x3. I think Tymon seems a bit more consistent than Max.

Tymon's recent results are 95% sub-6 averages, and he very rarely gets a low 6 average. Tymon also average about 2-4 sub-5 solves every competition. Of course, Max has also done this, but a bit less frequent than Tymon.

Max gets low 6 averagers a bit more frequently, and sometimes he also gets mid-6 averages. He also doesn't have as much sub-5 solves as Tymon. Currently Tymon has 32 sub-5 solves, and Max has 29 (I added his results from the 4.09 competitions to it already). So Max is not too far off, but I think overall Tymon is just more consistent than Max.

What's your opinion on this?

 

[cuberswoop]

So I've been looking at Tymon's and Max's recent results at each competition for 3x3. I think Tymon seems a bit more consistent than Max.

Tymon's recent results are 95% sub-6 averages, and he very rarely gets a low 6 average. Tymon also average about 2-4 sub-5 solves every competition. Of course, Max has also done this, but a bit less frequent than Tymon.

Max gets low 6 averagers a bit more frequently, and sometimes he also gets mid-6 averages. He also doesn't have as much sub-5 solves as Tymon. Currently Tymon has 32 sub-5 solves, and Max has 29 (I added his results from the 4.09 competitions to it already). So Max is not too far off, but I think overall Tymon is just more consistent than Max.

What's your opinion on this?

I think that Tymon is definitely more consistent, he almost always gets sub 5.5, and his PR is 5.09, that's not that far apart.

 

[Tabe]

I think that Tymon is definitely more consistent, he almost always gets sub 5.5, and his PR is 5.09, that's not that far apart.

3 of his last 10 averages are sub-5.5. Going back further, I stopped counting at 7 of his last 33. That's not even remotely close to "almost always".

 

[Tabe]

Well, if you actually looked at it, you'll find 9 sub-5.5 (I counted the 5.51 in here as well) out of 16 averages. That's more than 60 percent of his solves that are sub-5.5.

I did actually look at it. Feel free to tell me which of my two stats is wrong. Even if you wrongly count the 5.51 as sub-5.5, that still is only 8 of 16, not 9. Half the time isn't "almost always".

BTW, 9 of 16 is 56.25% not "more than 60%".