• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

What was cubing like from 1982-2003?

Check with Tony Fisher. That man has been involved with twisty puzzles for years, he probably has info about the beginning of the speedsolving community even though it's not his main focus.

Major props to those solving in 1982, it was much harder to get tips and tricks from other solvers in those (really 40 years ago?!? Wtf!) days.
 
Some cubers from before the SS Forum times have had stories about cubing history and what cubing was like for them in the 80s and 90s on their site(not sure if everybody still got their site up by now)
Lars Vandenbergh
Anthony Snider
Waterman
Gilles Roux
Jessica Fridrich
Are the ones I remember. Ron van Bruchem I think never had any stories on his website per se, but he did give interviews. You might also get information from the 90s at Stefan Pochmann's website, can't remember.

(I would say that there is some history on the Wiki, but experience has shown me that everytime in the last two years I make this claim, I then check the wiki and not find those pages anymore)

The Youtube Channel Cubing historian also has one video covering your request specifically and other videos of them have some information on the topic(like the Eastsheen and V-Cube videos)

Mike Hughey comes to mind who might know a thing or two, RedKB(?)
There is also this guy, Westlund, who claimed Megaminx times back in the 90s and they were active in the NES Tetris community until a few years back(Vandenbergh was as well a few years ago, but that doesn't matter too much), that might be a way to contact them.

I might continue if that's what others want.
 
I do remember buying a home-printed booklet somewhere in the years you mention that had a lot of algorithms in it that people had come up with over a few years after it came out. I would guess that was sold in the mid to late 80s? It was probably very early in that period. I think I got it by mail from some tiny ad in some magazine somewhere. I have no idea what happened to that booklet. I think I remember it having a blue cover and being white inside.

The early history of the pre-WCA started in a newsgroup. That was in 2000. The newsgroup moved to Yahoo! somewhere around the time the WCA was actually formed. I got back into cubing a bit later than that - late 2006. But I remember going back into the newsgroup and reading all the historical posts back as far as they went.

The TwistyPuzzles forum also got started really early - 2002. It might be a really good source of history.

I might try searching the Forum for some threads on the history after I get home from nationals.

Edit: Found this about the newsgroup by Chris Hardwick:
 
Last edited:
I do remember buying a home-printed booklet somewhere in the years you mention that had a lot of algorithms in it that people had come up with over a few years after it came out. I would guess that was sold in the mid to late 80s? It was probably very early in that period. I think I got it by mail from some tiny ad in some magazine somewhere. I have no idea what happened to that booklet. I think I remember it having a blue cover and being white inside.
David Singmaster's "Notes on Rubik's magic cube" perhaps?

I have the fifth edition, dated August 1980 which has a blue cover and it does sound a lot like you describe.
 
Interesting. It does match my description. A copy of it can be found here:

But somehow I thought that what I remembered was much smaller, just 8 to 12 pages, and contained nothing but algorithms, which included some found well after 1980. It's been decades so maybe my memory is bad. But if I'm remembering right, I wonder if it was something else also published by the Cubing Circular.
 
Some cubers from before the SS Forum times have had stories about cubing history and what cubing was like for them in the 80s and 90s on their site(not sure if everybody still got their site up by now)
Lars Vandenbergh
Anthony Snider
Waterman
Gilles Roux
Jessica Fridrich
Are the ones I remember. Ron van Bruchem I think never had any stories on his website per se, but he did give interviews. You might also get information from the 90s at Stefan Pochmann's website, can't remember.

(I would say that there is some history on the Wiki, but experience has shown me that everytime in the last two years I make this claim, I then check the wiki and not find those pages anymore)

The Youtube Channel Cubing historian also has one video covering your request specifically and other videos of them have some information on the topic(like the Eastsheen and V-Cube videos)

Mike Hughey comes to mind who might know a thing or two, RedKB(?)
There is also this guy, Westlund, who claimed Megaminx times back in the 90s and they were active in the NES Tetris community until a few years back(Vandenbergh was as well a few years ago, but that doesn't matter too much), that might be a way to contact them.

I might continue if that's what others want.
Do you have any links to those guys’ websites?
 
dob column seems very fishy. Anyway, I believe it's WCA policy not to publicize dob due to privacy concerns
Something cool I found out is that you can query all of the people who have competed in WCA competitions. This is a good way to see who some of the earliest cubers were
 
Between 1981 and 1990, very few people could solve the cube in general. Most cubes available were horrible; only the 'original Rubik's cube' had any chance of turning properly. All other clones were a joke (funny that the opposite is true today); by joke I mean 'wonderful puzzler' clone cubes were so hard to turn that a child was unable to make even a quarter turn. It took an adult with very strong arms to make a turn. A big thing with speed solvers was to try to modify the cube to make it work better. At the time, silicone lubricants didn't exist. Since water based lubes don't last more than a day and oil would destroy the plastic, vaseline (petroleum jelly) was really the only option. We would take the cube apart, apply the correct amount of jelly, then put it back together, and it would create a mess of jelly that would make the entire cube slippery, so it had to cleaned & washed well. Next, the stickering on cubes was weird & random; often blue was opposite of white. Some cubes came with purple stickers or brown or other weird colors. We would steal stickers from junk cubes and re-paste them onto your 'main' cube to create a good set of colors with the correct opposites. We also found that solving a cube 500 times would smooth out the plastic as the injection molded parts had parting lines and other jagged features. So the general pattern was fairly similar as today; solve 500 times, take apart, lubricate with vaseline, change the stickers. Some cubes did have screws to adjust tension as well. If you made the cube even slightly loose it tended to explode every few solves.

Regarding competition, it was almost impossible to race anyone because you could not find anyone who could solve the cube. If you were lucky enough to find someone who could solve it, they needed a book open in front of them and would take 20-30 minutes to solve it using the book; not competitive when you were trying to find sub-60 second solvers.

There was no internet, and no real magazines about cubing. The entire development of Waterman's method went on without anyone barely knowing about it, because there was no way to communicate between cubers. Each solver typically tried to create new algorithms (not by PC, but by random experiments), and we all tried to improve our method & speed by tweaking the method & algorithms, but there was little to compare it to, and no one to really talk to. Only the 1982 episode of 'That's Incredible' followed by the 1982 world championships made the news. So throughout the rest of the 1980's I was chasing the 22.95 second world record, never knowing if a new record had even been set.

After 1990, cubing began to disappear entirely. It became too lonely to try to be a cuber or to keep improving, with no one to compete against or talk to. It wasn't until the internet in 1998 that it became really possible to try to connect with other cubers. I recall in 2003 or 2004 seeing a web news article that stated there was a guy who was averaging 11 seconds on the 3x3, which I thought was pretty amazing.
 
Between 1981 and 1990, very few people could solve the cube in general. Most cubes available were horrible; only the 'original Rubik's cube' had any chance of turning properly. All other clones were a joke (funny that the opposite is true today); by joke I mean 'wonderful puzzler' clone cubes were so hard to turn that a child was unable to make even a quarter turn. It took an adult with very strong arms to make a turn. A big thing with speed solvers was to try to modify the cube to make it work better. At the time, silicone lubricants didn't exist. Since water based lubes don't last more than a day and oil would destroy the plastic, vaseline (petroleum jelly) was really the only option. We would take the cube apart, apply the correct amount of jelly, then put it back together, and it would create a mess of jelly that would make the entire cube slippery, so it had to cleaned & washed well. Next, the stickering on cubes was weird & random; often blue was opposite of white. Some cubes came with purple stickers or brown or other weird colors. We would steal stickers from junk cubes and re-paste them onto your 'main' cube to create a good set of colors with the correct opposites. We also found that solving a cube 500 times would smooth out the plastic as the injection molded parts had parting lines and other jagged features. So the general pattern was fairly similar as today; solve 500 times, take apart, lubricate with vaseline, change the stickers. Some cubes did have screws to adjust tension as well. If you made the cube even slightly loose it tended to explode every few solves.

Regarding competition, it was almost impossible to race anyone because you could not find anyone who could solve the cube. If you were lucky enough to find someone who could solve it, they needed a book open in front of them and would take 20-30 minutes to solve it using the book; not competitive when you were trying to find sub-60 second solvers.

There was no internet, and no real magazines about cubing. The entire development of Waterman's method went on without anyone barely knowing about it, because there was no way to communicate between cubers. Each solver typically tried to create new algorithms (not by PC, but by random experiments), and we all tried to improve our method & speed by tweaking the method & algorithms, but there was little to compare it to, and no one to really talk to. Only the 1982 episode of 'That's Incredible' followed by the 1982 world championships made the news. So throughout the rest of the 1980's I was chasing the 22.95 second world record, never knowing if a new record had even been set.

After 1990, cubing began to disappear entirely. It became too lonely to try to be a cuber or to keep improving, with no one to compete against or talk to. It wasn't until the internet in 1998 that it became really possible to try to connect with other cubers. I recall in 2003 or 2004 seeing a web news article that stated there was a guy who was averaging 11 seconds on the 3x3, which I thought was pretty amazing.
Thank you so much for all the details!
 
Back
Top