[Unofficial] Weird 3x3 PLL skip

Wow.... Why didn't I read this thread the first time around?!

Funny stuff.

Just to add something else, general and special relativity HAVE been proven wrong (some people say incomplete) using both "logic" and "mathematics".

Just the same way as Newton was proven wrong.

That is why the world of physics has moved on to other hypothesis such as string theory and M theory.

And just one personal gripe, I wish people would stop referring to the mathematical unit of 'c' as the 'speed of light'. It just happens that a mass-less photon (light) travels at c when in a vacuum.
 
The person doing one-handed in the video has really, really weird finger tricks...

And now I just read pages 9 and 10 or this thread. I think 9 sums it up pretty well xD He apparently disproved General Relativity but refuses to show how xD That's what I get out of it. It was pretty funny.

No that isn't even remotely true


How? I don't like comparing cubes to marbles, not that I ever do, but why not. If I have a bag of 10,000 green marbles, and one red marble. If I pull out one marble at a time, the chances of pulling out the red one start increasing. Would it not work for the cube?

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Last quote:

I am not saying anybody is wrong, just logically...

You may not be saying anybody is wrong, but we are saying you are... and there are numbers to prove it...

I know that numbers proved me wrong, but logically, which is the way I think, nobody has. Using logic, I have proved General Relativity wrong. But I know that I was wrong, because the math behind it. If I do the same OLL over and over again, a PLL skip will come more often than doing 100 different ones at random. Same with doing 6. Numbers don't mean anything when I am speaking logically. I know that this is not true though.

So they DID prove him wrong but they DIDN'T. WTF?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top