Waffle's Roux Tutorial

[soccerking813]

How many algs would it be for 4b+4c? If it is a low number I would consider trying to get them.

And for anyone who would like to use it, I found a scrambler that gives you M/U scrambles for Roux. I plan on practicing this a lot.
http://mzrg.com/miniSites/scrambler...scramble=roux&num=5&len=25&subbutton=Scramble!

I have a feeling that everyone already knows about this.

 

[byu]

It's always one of these:

M' U2 M AUF M2 AUF

or

M U2 M' AUF M2 AUF

 

[waffle=ijm]

How many algs would it be for 4b+4c? If it is a low number I would consider trying to get them.

And for anyone who would like to use it, I found a scrambler that gives you M/U scrambles for Roux. I plan on practicing this a lot.
http://mzrg.com/miniSites/scrambler...scramble=roux&num=5&len=25&subbutton=Scramble!

I have a feeling that everyone already knows about this.

I knew about this

 

[byu]

How many algs would it be for 4b+4c? If it is a low number I would consider trying to get them.

And for anyone who would like to use it, I found a scrambler that gives you M/U scrambles for Roux. I plan on practicing this a lot.
http://mzrg.com/miniSites/scrambler...scramble=roux&num=5&len=25&subbutton=Scramble!

I have a feeling that everyone already knows about this.

I knew about this

Haha, yeah, waffle gave me this website yesterday I think.

 

[soccerking813]

I dunno if someone has already posted this, but I found a nice alg for when the 4 edges on top are disoriented. M' U2 M' U2 M' U M'

I don't think it would really be worth it to have algs for ther permutation of edges. I always just get on in the D layer like waffle, then join them using M' U2 M', move to down layer, and then AUF, and M2. I think this is what Byu was saying.

 

[byu]

Yeah that's what I was saying. For 4 edges on U, I do:

M' U2 M U2 M' U2 M'

 

[waffle=ijm]

I dunno if someone has already posted this, but I found a nice alg for when the 4 edges on top are disoriented. M' U2 M' U2 M' U M'

I don't think it would really be worth it to have algs for ther permutation of edges. I always just get on in the D layer like waffle, then join them using M' U2 M', move to down layer, and then AUF, and M2. I think this is what Byu was saying.

that orientation is what i use.
if you follow the repetitive process of cycling the misoriented edges like in the 4a video it just ends up the same thing

 

[soccerking813]

Oh, sorry about reposting it then.

And I was thinking, would it be possible to have partial corner control when making the second 1x2x3 block?

 

[byu]

You could do a 1x2x2 instead of a 1x2x3 in DBR, and then use WV to add the last two pieces in, giving you a OCLL skip.

 

[soccerking813]

Yea, that would take quite a few algs though. I guess it wouldn't exactly be easy to add on to Roux.

 

[byu]

It's actually a pretty good idea. It requires 27 algorithms, if I remember correctly, which isn't bad compared to OLL at all. Winter Variation might actually be a good idea with Roux.

 

[soccerking813]

Umm, yea, I though it was more than 27 algs.

I might actually look into this. I will search google and the forums before I ask for any links.

 

[StachuK1992]

Actually, we don't need WV.
Some "algs" can be shortened...we don't have to keep EO in state, like WV does

 

[byu]

So, this is like a Non-EO preservation and non DF DB preservation WV. That makes things a bit easier, but where are we going to get all the algs? Anyone here know how to use ACube?

 

[soccerking813]

I don't know how to, but it is easier to just take those algs instead of making specific algs.

And I was looking at MLGS, and was wondering why it had 104 cases for corners, while WV has only 27 for basically the same thing.

 

[byu]

MGLS includes EO...

 

[soccerking813]

But, I mean, just the corner part takes more...
Wait, is it because he included the mirrors for MLGS, but the mirrors are not included in WV?

 

[StachuK1992]

I really don't think that WV or anything like that will help us here. Considering that we'll still have to do CPLL, it's just not worth it, imo.

 

[waffle=ijm]

I really don't think that WV or anything like that will help us here. Considering that we'll still have to do CPLL, it's just not worth it, imo.

agreed when you master CMLL you can do sub 3 corners. and when you consider WV and recognition time and then the recognition for CPLL. its pretty much pointless IMO

 

[StachuK1992]

Waffles...I know that I just started Roux, but I'd be interested in learning CMLL.
What sites do you suggest?