US Nationals 2009

Frank Morris, #1 6x6 and 7x7 solver just less than 2 years ago did not even make it past qualifications...

That shows that even the best cubers at the time have to continue practicing in order to keep up with the up and coming cubers they inspire..

Which is why you must always practice, or I'll overcome you with great speed. :cool:
 
Frank Morris, #1 6x6 and 7x7 solver just less than 2 years ago did not even make it past qualifications...

That shows that even the best cubers at the time have to continue practicing in order to keep up with the up and coming cubers they inspire..

And that now he's also not basically the only person in the world with a 6 and 7. Probably helps.
 
6x6 2:32.00 avg by Dan Cohen. nice, that is 6 WRs this weekend. and US nationals haven't reached its end yet...

SIX!!?!?!?11!?!! holy crap. Dan, you are a BEAST.

what all WRs did he get?

Dan set one of the six WRs this weekend. You misunderstood him. The other set were Magic Single (in Sweden) and Sq-1 avg, Sq-1 single, 3BLD, and MultiBLD (in Beijing).
 
http://caltech.cubingusa.com/usnationals2009/results/index.php?q=7

Looks like facebook may be correct. It appears he won 2x2, also.

Dan Cohen took 6x6x6 and Megaminx, the latter with a NAR for single and average.

Mr. Hashimoto won Magic, Timothy Sun took 4x4 BLD and Mike Hughey won 5x5 BLD, the only one to complete the solve successfully and with a very interesting time of 22:00.00.
 
Last edited:
But yeah. That 5BLD time is quite conspicuous :/

Yeah, solving in 22 minutes and 0 seconds clearly means Mike must have cheated.

WTF?!?!?!

Chris

Conspicuous != suspicious

Anyway, I don't think there's anything to it...there's a 1/60 chance of that happening, I wouldn't make anything of it.
 
Last edited:
But yeah. That 5BLD time is quite conspicuous :/

Yeah, solving in 22 minutes and 0 seconds clearly means Mike must have cheated.

WTF?!?!?!

Chris
no no no. I'm not saying that he cheated. I wouldn't think that of Mike at all.

I'm just saying maybe a timer got accidentally stopped at some point, and they rounded the time because of this.

I trust Mike completely with his BLD abilities. I don't think anyone would say otherwise.

EDIT:
Yes, Tim; I realize my failure. :/
I couldn't think of the 'right' word, so I just used a word that I thought would 'pass.' I guess it didn't.
 
Last edited:
But yeah. That 5BLD time is quite conspicuous :/

Yeah, solving in 22 minutes and 0 seconds clearly means Mike must have cheated.

WTF?!?!?!

Chris

Conspicuous only means noticeable. I think it certainly qualifies. He did not imply he cheated. Obviously nobody would think that. It's just a funny time.
 
Last edited:
Ok I admit I took the comment the wrong way, but I don't understand why 22:00 is a strange time. You all do realize that the time is marked incorrectly right? It will be recorded as 22:00 because it was timed with a stopwatch.

I guess I wondered why solving anytime between 22:00.00 and 22:00.99 would be considered "conspicuous".

Apologies.

Chris
 
Back
Top