Jakube
Veteran
Round 12: 2:36.88 (Mean of 2)
DNF, DNF, 2:41.48, DNF, 2:32.30
Very bad.
DNF, DNF, 2:41.48, DNF, 2:32.30
Very bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. Zane_C 1:14.09 average of 4/5
2. RyanReese09 1:38.91 average of 4/5
3. Mike Hughey 1:55.72 average of 5/5
4. Micael 2:21.50 average of 5/5
5. Norbi 2:51.52 average of 4/5
6. amostay2004 1:16.29 mean of 3/5
7. Xishem 3:21.30 mean of 3/5
8. Jakube 2:36.88 mean of 2/5
9. MatsBergsten 2:39.96 mean of 2/5
10. lucarubik 1:21.77 mean of 1/5
11. EricReese 5:20.08 mean of 1/5
After my results the past two weeks, I'm inclined to agree that it should be best of, because I was really too slow this week because I saw everyone else was getting full averages. But I hate the idea of best of 3 - too few attempts. How about best of 12, or perhaps best of 100? Seriously, I bet a best of 100 attempt would have a real possibility of helping me improve - the motivation would be right for it. Except if I got the first ten or fifteen all correct, I wouldn't be able to resist trying to get a valid average, which would ruin the whole thing.i think this should be best of 3 because it is easier to get fast if you risk, even if you DNF cubes anyway
1. Mike Hughey 1:55.74 average of 5/5
2. Jakube 2:19.37 average of 4/5
3. MatsBergsten 2:30.85 average of 4/5
4. Zane_C 1:17.44 mean of 2/5
5. aronpm 0:46.35 mean of 1/5
6. Xishem 2:26.13 mean of 1/5
7. amostay2004 DNF
Also, you're crazy.