teri2769
Member
Next: U' R' F' R2 F' U F' R2 U2
z2 y' F2 R U R' U R F' U' R2 F U2 // TEG2-
next: R2 U F U' F2 U2 F' R F
Next: U' R' F' R2 F' U F' R2 U2
z // inspectionz2 y' F2 R U R' U R F' U' R2 F U2 // TEG2-
next: R2 U F U' F2 U2 F' R F
U' F' U' B2 U B2 //FaceScramble: R2 F' R F2 U' R' F R' F' U
y' // Inspection
F R U' R' U' (R2 U R') // Layer
(R U' R') F R' F' R U2 // CLL
Final solution: F R U' R' U' R F R' F' R U2
Next: R' F2 R' U' R2 F' U2 R' U'
x' z // InspectionU' F' U' B2 U B2 //Face
y' R U R' U' R' F R F' //OLL
U2 R2 U' B2 U2 R2 U' R2 U2 //PBL
Next: R' F R2 F R' U2 F2 U' R'
x2 y' //InspectionScramble: U' R' F2 R' U R' U2 R' F2
y // Inspection
F R U2 (R U' R') // Layer
(R U2 R') F R' F' R2 U2 R' U' // CLL
Final solution: F R U2 R U R' F R' F' R2 U2 R' U'
Next: R U2 F' U R F2 R U R'
Next: F2 U' R U R U F' U' F2
z //Inspectiony' x' // Inspection
U R U R2 // Face
F' R U R' U' R' F R // OLL
U' D' R2 U' R2 U2 F2 U' R2 // PLL
Next: F2 R' U2 R2 F' R' U2 R' U
z2F' U2 R2 U F U' R' F' R2
z // inspectionz2
L2 U L2 // Face
y' U2 F U' R' F R U' F2 R U R' // EG - 1
Next: R2 F' R2 U2 F R' U R2 F'
NEXT: F' R F2 R' F R F' U2
This is in violation of regulation E2e/* Scramble */
F' R F2 R' F R F' U2
/* Solve */
U2 F R' F' L U2 L' U
This is in violation of regulation E2e
The competitor's solution must not be directly derived from any part of the scramble sequence. Penalty: disqualification of the attempt (DNF), at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
Abide by regulation E2e1 and I might accept your result
The WCA Delegate may ask the competitor to explain the purpose of each move in their solution, irrespective of the scramble sequence. If the competitor cannot give a valid explanation, the attempt is disqualified (DNF).
I deem your explanation invalid due to there being easier faces aside from green that would make more sense to do like orange:O didn't realize I reversed it. Here's my explanation:
I wanted to go for a layer, not just a face. At the start, I was starting with U B' L U2 L' which was good but I wanted to see if I could maybe get an easy WV or maybe even a WVCP, so I tried a couple different ways for insertion. Eventually, I tried U2 F R' F', which did the same thing as U B' but gives a different LSLL. I looked and saw that it was just the simple L U2 L' WVCP!
z' y2 // Inspection (0,0)NEXT: R2 U' R U' F' R2 F2 U2 F'
I deem your explanation invalid due to there being easier faces aside from green that would make more sense to do like orange
Also, you did this before in other threads
Also, This isn't a 2x2 FMC thread and it doesn't make too much sense to put so much thought into a 2x2 solve
is it just a prank bro? Is not not just a prank bro? Thats for you to decide
Next Scramble: U' F' U R U' F U2 R2 U'
x' yNext: U' R U2 F2 R F U' R2 U'
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Climber solves 2x2x2 one handed while hanging from a Beastmaster hangboard | Puzzle Video Gallery | 4 | ||
2X2X2 fmc! | Forum Competitions | 35 | ||
S | Does anyone recognize this 2x2x2 method? | Puzzle Theory | 11 | |
T | 2x2x2 scrambler | Cubing Help & Questions | 3 | |
The 2x2x2 2gen Example Solve Game | Example Solves Forum | 14 |