zzcuberman
Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
- Messages
- 285
you guys ruined this mans dreams lol. just do CT with C. its called C ++ itll give a overall lower movecount then CT and get you standard deviation lower.
Sadly theres always downsides... Its not to hard to leave on fr. But colorful pockets showed the intuitiveness of tsle can be done from all slots and then just align d for the ttls. For the step further into a hybrid adding in an alg or 2 of C shouldnt be much harder so really it can be as free as you want it to beThe main problem wit C++ compared to A is slot neutrality, which matters a lot more the faster you get. Ignoring better solutions for FR generally isn't a great idea and in most methods, not having a degree of freedom in the intuitive steps isn't great. For example, Roux SB has 4 possible corner edge pairs whereas if you did the back square first, you'd only ever have 2 pairs to choose from, even if the front square had a better solution.