[Unofficial] Ryosuke Mondo Overlapping Cube BLD DNF

[Swordsman Kirby]

Really, the UWR lists would accept anything nowadays. Some guy made a claim about a non-lucky solve, in which it involved a 4-move F2L, and a 2-orient LL.

What's the time/name? (I want to have a look)

#15: "9sec" by Black Mackenzie.

So my memory fails. It appears either to be an H-perm or a Z-perm rather than a two-orient for the LL, which is non-lucky only if he does something like ZBLL or just 1LLL. Additionally, it's 4-move first layer only, but that's lucky already.

 

[Lofty]

regardless of whether or not what he said is lucky what he has written along with the time being a perfect 9 seems to be garbage...I saw that one a while ago... first layer... and who has heard of a double switch I have never seen a LL alg called a double switch before.
I suppose with how many records are submitted they can't all be checked...

 

[ERandrubiks]

I want to do that blinfolded too but I don't have that kind of cube...

 

[Lucas Garron]

regardless of whether or not what he said is lucky what he has written along with the time being a perfect 9 seems to be garbage...I saw that one a while ago... first layer... and who has heard of a double switch I have never seen a LL alg called a double switch before.
I suppose with how many records are submitted they can't all be checked...

They mostly are. Ron just has to make some difficult decisions...

Anyhow, disregarding the claim, it actually looks like a misfiled 2x2x2 solve. (If you forget to select a category, it gets submitted as 3x3x3 single.)
I'm still not sure what the double-switch it. Did he mean 2-swap (in which case it's ambiguous) or E-perm (which is just silly)?