waffle=ijm
Waffo
nah i don't want to be banned. so I'll stop and apologize to the mods for my unruly behavior.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nah i don't want to be banned. so I'll stop and apologize to the mods for my unruly behavior.
Which do you think is best?
This is a pointless thread, which seems to be only here to start a flame war.
None is better than the other. The only difference is what people prefer to use/learn, depending on their own learning style/way their brains work.
There is no "one method is the best method."
There is no best method.
Methods depend on the person learning it.
Whatever is best for you, is best for you.
nah i don't want to be banned. so I'll stop and apologize to the mods for my unruly behavior.
we were just kidding, lol.
long quote
The point I'm making is that each method if given a "faz" would just be as fast as each other. Also the cuber>method.
And you have been right all along. Yet for some reason it turned into an 11 page war of pointless arguing.![]()
my point exactly.
Now, look behind you.
Still your mom.
Now, look out the window and see whos peeing on your cubes.
Wtf...this is getting just a little offtopic :fp
totally on topic wtf are you talking about?
Which do you think is best?
This is a pointless thread, which seems to be only here to start a flame war.
None is better than the other. The only difference is what people prefer to use/learn, depending on their own learning style/way their brains work.
There is no "one method is the best method."
There is no best method.
Methods depend on the person learning it.
Whatever is best for you, is best for you.
I guess I was right.
how...relevant...your point is completely invalid to this argument and I love Sarah more than you do.
how...relevant...your point is completely invalid to this argument and I love Sarah more than you do.![]()
how...relevant...your point is completely invalid to this argument and I love Sarah more than you do.![]()
but it's true?
how...relevant...your point is completely invalid to this argument and I love Sarah more than you do.![]()
but it's true?
how...relevant...your point is completely invalid to this argument and I love Sarah more than you do.![]()
but it's true?
Whos sarah?
So lets put it this way. Lets say a "Faz" existed for each of the 3 methods. This Faz is completely color neutral and recognizes cases (this would include blocks and bad edges) instantly. His TPS is off the charts and lets give him the perfect cube too. One that doesn't lock and pop like it was a night club.
Now what?
last post of the night:
no, see this is exactly what i mean. if you had someone like faz who mastered all three methods in three different parallel universes, the chance of him getting the exact same average time with all three methods is astronomically low. just as using beginner's method will give you a different time, using roux or fridrich will give you different average times. just because the difference may be small, say - half a second or one second, doesn't mean they're the same. it is extremely unlikely that all there methods are "equal". do you get what i'm trying to say now?