Roux Edge Orientation

[miniGOINGS]

ok so,, ive been experimenting with roux for like a week now (thanks to wafflejim and i have been working on step 4a: Edge Orientation

i am currently making als for each situation,, right now i have

0 bad edges


2 bad edges
(UU) = M’ U M U’ M’ U M’ or M’ U M’ U2 M’ U M’
(DD) = M U M U’ M’ U M’
(U)(D) = M' U M' U M U M'

4 bad edges
(UUUU) = M’ U2 M‘ U2 M’ U M’
(UUU)(D) = M’ U M’
(UU)(DD) = M U2 M‘ U2 M’ U M’ or M2 U’ M’ U M’

6 bad edge
(UUUU)(DD) = M' U M' U M U M' U2 M' U M'

if you could fill in some of the blanks or optimize some of them that would be appreciated,, the ones in brackets are the edges that are bad,,

 

[Johannes91]

(UU) is ambiguous; it could mean either two adjacent or two opposite edges.

See this recent thread and Gilles' site.

 

[miniGOINGS]

(UU) is ambiguous; it could mean either two adjacent or two opposite edges.

yes i know,, thats why i put 2 algorithms,, the first fixes two opposite,, and second fixes two adjecent

 

[miniGOINGS]

and thanks for the link i have been looking for a thread like this for a while but havnt been able too...

 

[Johannes91]

yes i know,, thats why i put 2 algorithms,, the first fixes two opposite,, and second fixes two adjecent

Ah ok, I didn't notice that.

 

[miniGOINGS]

its all good but is there a shorter set that doesnt place the UL and UR peices?

 

[miniGOINGS]

it would be really good if some fast roux solver could help me out...hint hint waffle...

 

[soccerking813]

ok so,, ive been experimenting with roux for like a week now (thanks to wafflejim and i have been working on step 4a: Edge Orientation

i am currently making als for each situation,, right now i have

0 bad edges


2 bad edges
(UU) = M’ U M U’ M’ U M’ or M’ U M’ U2 M’ U M’
(DD) = M U M U’ M’ U M’
(U)(D) = ?

4 bad edges
(UUUU) = M’ U2 M‘ U2 M’ U M’
(UUU)(D) = M’ U M’
(UU)(DD) = M U2 M‘ U2 M’ U M’ or M2 U’ M’ U M’

6 bad edge
(UUUU)(DD) = ?

if you could fill in some of the blanks or optimize some of them that would be appreciated,, the ones in brackets are the edges that are bad,,

That's funny, I just did the same thing yesterday. I will give you the ones you don't already have.

2 Bad Edges:
UU(Adjacent, UB and UL): M' U M' U2 M' U M'
UU(Opposite, UF and UB): M' U M U' M' U M'
DD(Opposite, DF and DB): M U M U' M' U M'
UD(UF and DB): M' U M' U' D2 M' U M' D2

6 Bad Edges:
UUUU DD: M' U M' D2 M' U M' U' D2 M' U M'

Other than these. mine are the same, except for the first UU, DD. My alg was longer.

 

[miniGOINGS]

ok so,, ive been experimenting with roux for like a week now (thanks to wafflejim and i have been working on step 4a: Edge Orientation

i am currently making als for each situation,, right now i have

0 bad edges


2 bad edges
(UU) = M’ U M U’ M’ U M’ or M’ U M’ U2 M’ U M’
(DD) = M U M U’ M’ U M’
(U)(D) = ?

4 bad edges
(UUUU) = M’ U2 M‘ U2 M’ U M’
(UUU)(D) = M’ U M’
(UU)(DD) = M U2 M‘ U2 M’ U M’ or M2 U’ M’ U M’

6 bad edge
(UUUU)(DD) = ?

if you could fill in some of the blanks or optimize some of them that would be appreciated,, the ones in brackets are the edges that are bad,,

That's funny, I just did the same thing yesterday. I will give you the ones you don't already have.

2 Bad Edges:
UU(Adjacent, UB and UL): M' U M' U2 M' U M'
UU(Opposite, UF and UB): M' U M U' M' U M'
DD(Opposite, DF and DB): M U M U' M' U M'
UD(UF and DB): M' U M' U' D2 M' U M' D2

6 Bad Edges:
UUUU DD: M' U M' D2 M' U M' U' D2 M' U M'

Other than these. mine are the same, except for the first UU, DD. My alg was longer.

thanks a lot and by the way my PB with Roux is better than yours lol

 

[soccerking813]

thanks a lot and by the way my PB with Roux is better than yours lol

*Quickly does solves using Roux*
Meh, only 0.05 better. My average kills your though.

 

[miniGOINGS]

thanks a lot and by the way my PB with Roux is better than yours lol

*Quickly does solves using Roux*
Meh, only 0.05 better. My average kills your though.

kills? its only .34 better lol

 

[soccerking813]

thanks a lot and by the way my PB with Roux is better than yours lol

*Quickly does solves using Roux*
Meh, only 0.05 better. My average kills your though.

kills? its only .34 better lol

Meh, still better.
I think I will be getting around a 45 second average tomorrow though.

 

[miniGOINGS]

how long have you been working on roux?

 

[soccerking813]

About, *Checks watch*, 36 hours now.

 

[miniGOINGS]

niiiiice but you have fridrich experience maybe thats why,, i went from basic LBL to basic CF and still havnet fully switched to Roux yet

 

[soccerking813]

You mean Cf as in Corners First? If so, that is a very big switch. Totally different recognition and stuff. I experimented with corners first a while ago, but didn't really like it.

 

[miniGOINGS]

yea,, the basic one off of http://http://rubikscube.info/beginner.php i average sub 60 with that one but my block building sucks so i average about sub 80 with roux usually

 

[miniGOINGS]

wow,, im averaging 50.88 today with CF

 

[miniGOINGS]

HAHAHA!!! i just got a pop,, dropped the piece,, put it back in and got 60.06!! wow that was fun

 

[Rawn]

Here's the ones that I use.

(U)(D): M' U M' U M U M'
All edges: M' U M' U M U M' U2 M' U M'