Racing to sub-20

[khoavo12]

Round 294 - 3x3 on 4x4

Session Average: 21.01
σ: 2.70
Best Time: 17.91
Worst Time: 27.33
Individual Times:
20.76, 20.14, 21.07, 20.94, 23.81, (17.91), 19.57, (27.33), 23.08, 22.34, 19.19, 19.23

 

[MarcelP]

Round 294


29.93 26.79 (30.95) 28.54 (22.01) 30.06 28.39 25.23 30.64 29.92 28.82 23.26 = 28.16 // That went terrible

 

[cowabunga]

Round 294
22.28
19.45, 24.26, (27.39), 25.09, 19.21, 22.16, 20.94, 22.45, (18.98), 23.21, 21.99, 24.04

 

[Antikrister]

Average:
21.16

20.72, 21.55, 19.39, 22.49, 22.32, 20.56, 20.25, 20.35, (18.45), 21.17, 22.75, (24.73)

A little nervous. My look ahead was messed up. Worse than my 75cubes average I did two days ago...

 

[kcl]

Avg: 20.35
Best time: 18.05
Worst time: 22.92
Individual: 22.92, 18.70, 20.26, 18.05, 19.74, 20.35, 19.06, 20.13, 22.41, 21.10, 22.76, 18.74
Pretty good average for me

 

[aznanimedude]

294

Average: 22.26
21.31, 21.70, 22.42, 23.58, 19.74, 25.55, 23.57, (26.69), 23.51, (18.61), 18.80, 22.43

w000000000000

 

[Mike Hughey]

Round 294 Results​

1. kclejeune 20.35
2. khoavo12 (3x3 on 4x4) 21.01
3. Antikrister 21.16
4. Schmidt 21.93
5. PeelingStickers (Rubik's brand) 22.18
6. kbrune 22.21
7. aznanimedude 22.26
8. cowabunga 22.28
9. Mike Hughey 24.16
10. JianhanC (OH) 26.02
11. MarcelP 28.16

Alumni (these people have already achieved sub-20 three times with no over 20 results in between, and therefore are considered to have graduated):

1. KCuber (ZZ) 23.27

Congratulations to everyone!

 

[Mike Hughey]

ROUND

Potential Closing Time - March 28, 2013 || 12:01PM EST​

Scrambles for the 295th round:

1. B' U2 L2 U2 B2 U2 F D2 R2 F R2 U' L F' D2 R F' R2 B U L
2. U B' R U B L' U D2 F' L' U R2 L2 U2 R2 D2 B2 R2 L2 U'
3. D2 B' U2 F' R2 F R2 D2 R2 D' L F2 U B U' R2 U' B' R
4. U2 F2 B R' B2 D F' R' L2 U B2 L B2 R2 U2 L' U2 L D2 R B2
5. B2 D2 L2 F' D2 F' R2 F' D2 F U' L2 F' L' R2 B U2 R2 U2 R
6. F2 D2 F2 L' U2 R2 B2 L U2 R B2 U' B U2 F D F2 R' F
7. U L2 U' R2 B2 R2 F2 D2 U' B2 U F' R2 B2 D R B2 L B' R2 F2
8. R2 U2 L2 U2 F' L2 B2 D2 R2 F R2 U' F' D2 B' F2 D R F U
9. R2 B2 R D' L' D B R2 L' F2 L2 B2 D2 B L2 B R2 U2 B' L2
10. B2 U2 L2 F' U2 F2 R2 D2 R2 B D' B' L' F' D2 B U' L' F2 D'
11. D2 F2 U B2 D' L2 R2 D' F2 U2 L2 R U B2 F R2 F' D' R2 D' U2
12. L' D B2 L B2 R F R' U' R D2 L' F2 D2 R2 L D2 R' B2

 

[Mike Hughey]

Round 295
24.37
(19.28), 24.86, 27.50, (31.96), 27.31, 24.33, 23.25, 20.27, 25.36, 23.56, 25.91, 21.31

Why do I always have to get so much worse in order to eventually improve?

 

[PeelingStickers]

Round 295

Rubik's brand cube

23.91, 22.24, 19.92, 30.75, DNF, 24.51, 27.07, 25.30, 21.41, 21.65, 19.89, 27.69 = 24.51

Algorithms hurt on this cube, the 30.75 was a nine second PLL.

 

[Schmidt]

Schmidt : Round 295 : 23.01 (σ = 2.40)

22.18, 25.33[PLL], 25.59, 23.93, 23.71, 27.05, 24.96, 19.38, 17.44, 22.06, 24.25, 18.72

Good-ish towards the end. Last 5 was 20.05 ao5

 

[Musicalboy2]

Round 295 (OH)
Average: 25.95

23.11, 26.58, (22.35), 27.22, 24.49, 29.08, 28.09, 23.66, 26.32, 25.03+, (29.25), 25.96

Rejoining a race thread, haven't been in one of these for a while.

On a side note, I think I need a new OH V-perm...

 

[Schmidt]

OH V-perm: R U2 R' D R U' R U' R U R2 D R' U' R D2 (well, it's better than the standard alg.)

 

[cowabunga]

Round 295
21.57

24.75, 21.63, 21.58, (26.03+), 17.20, 19.31, 22.68, (15.70), 23.02, 17.67, 22.70, 25.13

 

[Mike Hughey]

Round 295 Results​

1. cowabunga 21.57
2. Schmidt 23.01
3. Mike Hughey 24.37
4. PeelingStickers (Rubik's brand) 24.51
5. Musicalboy2 (OH) 25.95

Congratulations to everyone!

 

[Mike Hughey]

ROUND

Potential Closing Time - April 1, 2013 || 12:01PM EST​

Scrambles for the 296th round:

1. L2 D' L2 F2 U F2 D F2 L2 D2 B' R' F' D' B F L R' B2 U'
2. U2 L2 F2 D2 F2 R2 U2 L F2 L2 U' F U' F' L D B2 F D' F
3. D U2 R2 B2 F2 D2 B2 D B2 U' L2 B R2 D F' R2 D' F2 L' R U'
4. F2 R2 D B2 U' F2 U2 F2 R2 D' U2 B' D2 R' U L F D2 B2 F D
5. D' B2 F2 D' L2 D' B2 D2 F2 R2 D2 R' B U' L' D2 U B' D2 U'
6. D' F2 L2 U R2 F2 U' R2 F2 L' F' U R' B' L U2 R2 U' R' D
7. U2 R2 D2 B' F' D2 B' D2 L2 U2 B' L D B U' L D' L' U2 L D'
8. D2 L2 B' F' D2 B' L2 F' D2 F D2 U B2 L' D L' D2 R2 B L D
9. D2 F2 R' B2 R U2 L' U2 B2 D2 R' F' U F D B U' B R U2 R2
10. D' B2 U2 R2 F2 L2 U B2 R2 F2 U F' U R' D F2 D2 R D2 L' D2
11. R2 U2 R' B2 U2 B2 R F2 L U2 L' B F' R' U' B' L U2 B' D' L'
12. F2 L2 F L B R' F' B2 U' R2 F2 L2 U2 B2 D2 B2 R D2 L U2

 

[Mike Hughey]

Round 296
25.72
26.35, (37.79), 26.67, 25.43, 20.68, 20.76, 22.99, (20.00), 23.18, 27.11, 36.74, 27.24

Wow, nice to see all my hard work paying off, huh?

Why is it that it seems like other people actually consistently improve, and don't have to actually get worse first to get better? Don't other people have problems with new algorithms slowing them down until they get used to them? It seems like it's only me.

Anyway, I've relearned all my OLLs. Now I just have to stop making all the mistakes.

 

[cubizh]

Round 296
Avg: 22.22

(25.25), 22.36, 23.34, 23.00, (16.75), 21.53, 23.55, 22.61, 20.63, 18.59, 21.50, 25.06

Still the same type of times. Meh :/

 

[aznanimedude]

Round 296: Average 19.56
22.22, 16.61, 16.94, 19.94, 18.49, 20.58, 24.11, 19.10, (15.76), 19.57, (28.22), 18.08

well that was pretty good.......................uhhh....yeah, random 28.22 at the end i forgot the COLL so i derp mode paused
also lol my first solve time was the same as your average, 22.22 dat 2 consistency

 

[Musicalboy2]

OH V-perm: R U2 R' D R U' R U' R U R2 D R' U' R D2 (well, it's better than the standard alg.)

Thanks, I'll try this one.

Round 296
Average: 26.62
Standard deviation: 5.98 (lol..)

26.51, 22.14, 21.20, (40.61), (17.41), 28.58, 30.07, 26.46, 25.85, 32.45, 31.47, 21.44

That was a weird set of times...
On the bright side, at least I got a single sub 20 solve.

Edit: Forgot to write that this is OH... oh well.