Racing to sub-20

I'll be joining for the first time.
For round 71, here are my results:

27.01
29.47
22.58
(21.49)
30.89
23.32
26.63
30.35
24.43
24.84
23.19
(32.12)

Avg12: 26.27
 
(17.42), 19.56, 19.18, (30.03), 19.19, 21.48, 20.78, 19.09, 21.43, 18.80, 19.22, 20.13

=19.89 (σ = 0.96)

Finally broken the barrier. Shame about the 30.03...
 
Joining!

session avg: 27.44 (σ = 2.21)
session mean: 27.50


25.12
27.72
22.58
28.60
27.57
27.81
33.09
30.8
25.64
26.80
30.72
23.51

Perfect inconsistency example... yet a PB for me :)
 
Yesssssss I haven't been officially taking part in this but after a year and a half cubing I got my first three sub-20 solves today :D I understand the joyous feeling now
 
Ive decided to join in on the thread:
24.62
28.03
24.41
26.55
26.89
28.56
25.31
27.10
25.19
24.79
25.51
24.48

25.85

Its too bad though, that is one of my worst avgs of 12 in a while, i usually average like 23s :confused:
 
Round 71

1. 18.71
2. 21.83
3. 22.46
4. 23.37
5. 22.94
6. 22.58 (+2) = 24.58
7. 19.75
8. 16.95
9. 23.84
10. 24.82
11. 23.59
12. 22.62

Average: 22.12

First week on this thread and I broke a PB average and almost broke a single... Damn.
 
Joining as 3x3x3 phase of 4x4x4 (after reduction). Using no inspection

number of times: 12/12
best time: 18.55
worst time: 31.72

current avg5: 21.78 (σ = 1.32)
best avg5: 20.32 (σ = 1.62)

current avg12: 21.87 (σ = 1.64)
best avg12: 21.87 (σ = 1.64)

session avg: 21.87 (σ = 1.64)
session mean: 22.41

22.42, 23.15, 23.21, 22.76, 31.72, 19.44, 18.93[coll pll skip], 23.45, 18.55, 22.58, 22.84, 19.93

I guess I can't complain with sub22..meh. It's faster then I thought I was. I do quite horrible crosses with no inspection :(
 
16.75, DNF, 17.56, 20.60, 21.14, 23.06, 17.92, 19.65, 19.25, 22.67, 20.64, 18.35 = 20.08avg

The DNF popped into my tea mug =)

I haven't been practicing much in the last couple of weeks. I'm surprised it was that close.
 
Average: 26.28

(19.39) 28.59 25.43 25.29 23.61 25.22 27.30 29.89 27.87 (30.36) 22.15 27.49

Mean: 26.05
Standard deviation: 3.08
Best Time: 19.39
Worst Time: 30.36

1. 19.39 D2 B' R2 U2 L F' U L U2 L' U F' L2 R B2 U B2 U
2. 28.59 B' D' L2 U L R2 B2 U L2 U' F R D2 B' L2 D U2 R' U'
3. 25.43 U F' D L B' D' L2 F R2 D R F2 U2 B2 D' R D2 U'
4. 25.29 U F D L2 R' B2 R2 U2 F' D B2 R2 D' R U B' R U2
5. 23.61 D B F2 D' R2 U B D' R U F L B' U2 R2 B D2
6. 25.22 F R U2 F L R' F' L2 F' U2 L' F D' F' D U' F R
7. 27.30 L' U2 B' F2 D2 U' B2 U' R' D2 L' B' R2 B2 U R U F2
8. 29.89 L2 B2 F2 L' B' L' D F2 U R F U2 B L' D B2 F U2
9. 27.87 F' L' B2 L' U F2 U' B2 F D R' D' F L F R U2 R'
10. 30.36 R F R B2 R' F2 D' B2 R' F L' F' L' B' U R' B R2
11. 22.15 B2 F' D R2 D B L' R' F' D' R F' R2 F R' D F'
12. 27.49 L' D' B2 R2 U R' F D F D2 B L2 F U2 R B2 D' U2
 
Round 71 Results​

  1. Yes, We Can! (OH) 18.41
  2. Keroma12 19.81
  3. clincr 19.89
  4. cube-o-holic 20.08
  5. fariq 20.57
  6. mrjames113083 20.63
  7. choza244 21.38
  8. xbrandationx 21.56
  9. Elliot (OH) 21.56
  10. ElectricDoodie 21.80
  11. RyanReese09 (4x4x4) 21.87
  12. Vinny 22.12
  13. hatter 22.19
  14. Mike Hughey 22.25
  15. antoineccantin 22.51
  16. masteranders1 22.67
  17. Kev43 23.46
  18. Specs112 25.61
  19. minime12358 25.85
  20. Zarxrax 26.27
  21. Brest 26.28
  22. ruff48 27.09
  23. UnAbusador 27.44
  24. da25centz 27.81
  25. spunkymp4 28.66

Wow - lots of competitors this round; to all the new people, welcome! And there were lots of really good times this round, too - perhaps they were easy scrambles?

Alumni (these people have already achieved sub-20 three times with no over 20 results in between, and therefore are considered to have graduated):
  1. mehran_bj6890 19.49

Congratulations to everyone!
 
ROUND
number%2072.jpg

Potential Closing Time - January 13, 2011 || 12:01PM EST​

Scrambles for the 72nd round:
  1. R B L2 F2 R U R B' F U2 B D B' L2 B F' R
  2. B F L2 F' L2 R2 B' L' D L' B2 L R2 B2 D' R' D' U'
  3. R2 D' R' U R2 D2 F L2 F2 R U2 B' L2 D U' L D U'
  4. B' F2 L' D F2 D' B' D' B' L' R' D' L2 D B2 U' F L2
  5. U' F2 D' B D2 L' R' U R F' R' U' B' R' F' R' B2 U
  6. U2 L2 B U2 L D' R2 F L' F D B L2 D' F2 U2 R'
  7. D U2 F D F2 D' L2 R D' B' L B2 U' R2 F' L' F' U'
  8. D2 F2 D2 R' F L F L2 D B' L2 U' R' D2 B2 R' B R'
  9. B2 R2 F2 R' U' R' B R B R D2 F U' F2 L2 B' F2 D'
  10. D2 L' B2 D' L2 U L R' U' R2 B F' D2 L' F L2 R B'
  11. B L2 U2 B' D' R2 D' L' B2 U R2 F' U B R D2 F2
  12. D2 F R2 F D' R2 D' B F2 L D B F2 L' U' B' F' L2
 
Round 72
22.85
24.97, 21.36, 22.32, 23.12, (19.60), 21.74, 21.26, 27.54, 22.88, 22.40, (28.26), 20.88

Would have been a little better except that I was really slow on a couple of G perms in there. If I don't practice my new G perms for a couple of days in a row, I lose them - even several months after learning them. It just takes so long for algorithms to really stick for me.
 
20.72, 19.34, (16.81), 21.97, 20.63, 20.82, 21.02, (23.05), 19.16, 18.68, 21.89, 16.82

= 20.11 (σ = 1.52)

Very nice again, with a decent slowest time. A couple of 16s :)

Mike: I had this problem when I was first learning 2 look OLLs and PLLs, but after that it took a lot less time to learn them and for them to stick in my mind. If you get what I mean. Are you sure it isn't just the algorithms themselves? Mine flow very nicely and so are easy to remember. I could even call them sexy (almost).
 
Back
Top