Schmidt
Veteran
Unacceptable??
Race to Full OLL
- Thread starter Clayy9
- Start date
Unacceptable??
vcuber13
Veteran
what is?
Clayy9
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Messages
- 722
A) That's nice. A quick look at the wiki (pages "Last Layer" "2LLL" and "4LLL") proves I'm correct.
B) As far as I know, it's a 1-look OLL.
Rpotts
Veteran
Uhh a few of the algs I use for OLL involve a combination of sunes and Fsexy, they are definitely 1-look though. Clayy you are wrong.
and the whole thing about looks being number of steps is just silly, a look is a look, if you can do the alg in 1 look then it's one look, whether or not you can break the alg down into multiple "steps."
and the whole thing about looks being number of steps is just silly, a look is a look, if you can do the alg in 1 look then it's one look, whether or not you can break the alg down into multiple "steps."
vcuber13
Veteran
so your saying bld has more than 1 look?
Clayy9
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Messages
- 722
I took those statements from the Wiki. If what's stated in the Wiki is wrong, then I'll admit I'm wrong. Now, onto the alg he used. First, it was F R U R' U' F', obviously used to orient edges. The second part (R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R) was the alg that is used for a known 2-look OLL (OLL 22).
Where did I say that? I wasn't talking about BLD, I was talking about OLL.
vcuber13
Veteran
you essentially said that look and step is interchangeable, he is doing 2 steps (eo co) therefore 2 looks, why doesnt this statement apply to all of cubing?
also there was a thread about putting 2 olls together for other cases, but i cant find it, maybe someone else can.
also there was a thread about putting 2 olls together for other cases, but i cant find it, maybe someone else can.
Last edited:
Clayy9
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Messages
- 722
Why does it have to? I was talking about OLLs in specific, and the wiki pages for LL are where I got my information.
Rpotts
Veteran
Right, i'm not saying that those two algs aren't common 2-look Algs, but if he has that entire alg memorized to solve that particular OLL in one look, then it's an OLL.
Albeit a bad one.
uberCuber
Legend
Since I said this earlier in the thread:
I did get out my Rubik's brand to see what I could do, and got 6.88 TPS on the first one and 7.81 TPS on the second one.
I did get out my Rubik's brand to see what I could do, and got 6.88 TPS on the first one and 7.81 TPS on the second one.
vcuber13
Veteran
would you consider steps=looks for 4x4 pll and i mean real pll
Clayy9
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Messages
- 722
Define "real pll".
RyanReese09
Premium Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,033
- Location
- Whiteford, MD, USA
- WCA ID
- 2010REES01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Clay, you are wrong. Go down a quart of icecream and pass out for a few hours. You should come to your senses after that.
i can't wait for the t-olls 
round 1
oll 55
average: 3.05
times: 5.05, 3.32, 3.26, 2.73, 3.25, 2.96, 3.35, 2.75, 2.63, 2.43, 3.13, 3.12
oll 23
average: 2.58
times: 2.42, 2.24, 2.80, 2.42, 2.89, 1.98, 3.04, 2.40, 2.74, 3.17, 2.61, 2.29
round 1
oll 55
average: 3.05
times: 5.05, 3.32, 3.26, 2.73, 3.25, 2.96, 3.35, 2.75, 2.63, 2.43, 3.13, 3.12
oll 23
average: 2.58
times: 2.42, 2.24, 2.80, 2.42, 2.89, 1.98, 3.04, 2.40, 2.74, 3.17, 2.61, 2.29
uberCuber
Legend
cool story bro
Forte
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2009
- Messages
- 1,151
- Location
- Waterloo, Ontario
- WCA ID
- 2009SHIN02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I win
vcuber13
Veteran
same as pll on 3x3, but not in the context which is assumed
Tall5001
Premium Member
just adding my 2 cents worth
Yes the kid used 2 look OLL i use the same alg currently and i can do it in "1 look" but its still considered a 2 look OLL. The point of this was to learn new algs that solve it without using a already exisiting OLL. What i usually do is take the fruf and do it till i get a OLL i know but i know the combinations so its 1 look but multiple steps. I think this thread is a great idea i will do it when i have time!
Yes the kid used 2 look OLL i use the same alg currently and i can do it in "1 look" but its still considered a 2 look OLL. The point of this was to learn new algs that solve it without using a already exisiting OLL. What i usually do is take the fruf and do it till i get a OLL i know but i know the combinations so its 1 look but multiple steps. I think this thread is a great idea i will do it when i have time!
vcuber13
Veteran
so everyone needs to make up their own alg?
