Race to Full OLL

[Ranzha]

Don't make me get out my Rubik's brand and beat you at TPS with it.

If we're going for tps, I got 6.32tps and 9.09tps for these two. And I just learned OLL 55. I think that's pretty good.

 

[Jorghi]

If we're going for tps, I got 6.32tps and 9.09tps for these two. And I just learned OLL 55. I think that's pretty good.

Whats your TPS PB.

 

[RyanReese09]

Whats your TPS PB.

For me, 18 or 19 TPS. Forget which.

Sexy *6.

 

[Erzz]

55: Ao12 = 3.17 (4.73 TPS)
3.31, 2.98, (5.64), 2.78, 2.92, 4.18, 3.09, 2.79, 3.42, 3.16, (2.54), 3.07
L F' L' U' L F' L' U L F L' U' M' U M

23: Ao12 = 2.10 (4.28 TPS)
2.40, 2.39, 2.14, (2.92), 2.03, 2.44, 2.28, 2.00, 2.60, 1.99, 2.30, (1.86)
R2 D' R U2 R' D R U2 R

So inconsistent. Faster than 2look at least (by like half a second).

 

[ben1996123]

23:

Alg: [R U2 R' U' R U' R'][L' U2 L U L' U L] = 14

Times: 1.77, 2.22, 1.86, (2.40), 1.97, 1.41, 2.11, 1.88, 1.72, 1.72, 1.46, (1.33) = 1.812

TPS: 14/1.812 = 7.73


55:

Alg: [F R U R' U' F'][R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R] = 15

Times: 2.53, 2.06, 2.33, (3.30), 2.77, 2.34, 2.22, 2.19, (1.88), 2.08, 2.93, 2.46 = 2.391

TPS: 15/2.391 = 6.27

 

[blakedacuber]

23:

Alg: [R U2 R' U' R U' R'][L' U2 L U L' U L] = 14

Times: 1.77, 2.22, 1.86, (2.40), 1.97, 1.41, 2.11, 1.88, 1.72, 1.72, 1.46, (1.33) = 1.812

TPS: 14/1.812 = 7.73


55:

Alg: [F R U R' U' F'][R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R] = 15

Times: 2.53, 2.06, 2.33, (3.30), 2.77, 2.34, 2.22, 2.19, (1.88), 2.08, 2.93, 2.46 = 2.391

TPS: 15/2.391 = 6.27

wy use 2 look for oll 55?

 

[Clayy9]

wy use 2 look for oll 55?

That's a very good point. I should have added: you're not supposed to use 2-look OLL!

 

[Jaycee]

Strange, I don't see my name in the first post for 23 and 55 completed

 

[Clayy9]

Strange, I don't see my name in the first post for 23 and 55 completed

Sorry, I need to update it again.

 

[Jaycee]

No prob Also, where are you generating the algorithms?

 

[Clayy9]

No prob Also, where are you generating the algorithms?

Cube Explorer. In future rounds, I'll have the scrambles the same length, unlike the current round.

 

[vcuber13]

wy use 2 look for oll 55?

That's a very good point. I should have added: you're not supposed to use 2-look OLL!

who said its 2 look?

 

[Clayy9]

who said its 2 look?

55:

Alg: [F R U R' U' F'][R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R]

He did.

 

[vcuber13]

i dont see it

 

[Clayy9]

i dont see it

I even quoted it for you. Look 1: F R U R' U' F' | Look 2: R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R

 

[blakedacuber]

i dont see it

how is it not 2look?

 

[vcuber13]

I even quoted it for you. Look 1: F R U R' U' F' | Look 2: R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R

set up the oll, have the bar horizontal, close your eyes, do F R U R' U' F' R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R.
How many times did you look?

 

[Schmidt]

i dont see it

55:

Alg: [F R U R' U' F'][R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R] = 15

Times: 2.53, 2.06, 2.33, (3.30), 2.77, 2.34, 2.22, 2.19, (1.88), 2.08, 2.93, 2.46 = 2.391

TPS: 15/2.391 = 6.27

The solution above is not a part of the Wiki:


OLL 55


Name:
Used in: OLL
Optimal moves: 11 HTM
R U2 R2 U' R U' R' U2 F R F'
R' U2 R2 U R' U R U2 y l' U' l
r U2 R2 F R F' U2 r' F R F'
y R' F R U R' F R U' R' F' R U M' U' M
L F' L' U' L F' L' U L F L' U' M' U M
(L F' L' U' L F' L' U L F L' U' L)(R' F R) L'
R d' R2 D R' U2 R D' R2 d R'
y r U2 R' U' R2 r' U R' U' r U' r'

 

[Clayy9]

set up the oll, have the bar horizontal, close your eyes, do F R U R' U' F' R U2 R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R.
How many times did you look?

"look(s)", in cubing terminology, means steps. There are two steps that he did. One was to orient the edges of the LL, and the second step was orienting the corners of the LL. Hence, two-look.

The solution above is not a part of the Wiki

So? If you inverse my scramble algorithms, they still solve the OLL in 1 look, but they aren't part of the Wiki.

 

[vcuber13]

"look(s)", in cubing terminology, means steps. There are two steps that he did. One was to orient the edges of the LL, and the second step was orienting the corners of the LL. Hence, two-look.

A) I disagree
B) Then why do you have no objection to the other alg he used?

The solution above is not a part of the Wiki:

Go on...
And it is...