• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Probability Thread

The human doesn't check anything, because clearly humans suck at checking scrambles :)
In some further stage, it should be possible to take a picture of the cube with your smartphone and have the app say "Yeah, I think this matches the scramble" or "You misscrambled".

Okay gotcha. So 3 faces correct, since that's the most with one picture, all adjacent. As a noob at probability calculating I think it's 54/(43*10^15) (I can't remember the actual number of possible states and my internet is too slow right now) which is tiny. But even so, that's from somehow randomly misscrambling the rest, and the amount of those states that could actually be achieved by misscrambling by one or two moves would be a lot smaller, I'd guess for most scrambles it's actually 0. By the way, will you actually make a timer with this function? If so, that's really cool.
 
Last edited:
I just got a LS+LL skip with no AUF and no parity on a 4x4, and no, that's not a typo of any sort. I solved my third pair, and the cube was solved. I'm completely in disbelief, and I feel pretty certain this is the most statistically unlikely thing that will ever happen to me with cubing, no matter how long I cube. I'm absolutely stunned that this happened. It'll be 1/8 as likely as a normal last layer skip, considering that I didn't get either parity or AUF, but I have no idea how unlikely skipping last slot in addition to all that is.

It was a seemingly normal scramble from a timer I know has decent scrambles, which I solved with Yau. I tried reconstructing, but it was hopeless. There was nothing notable about the solve until the very end; I don't remember anything about the beginning.

After reduction, I had solved the FR and BL pairs, and I did L' U L R' U2 R to solve the back right pair. In doing so, I accidentally solved the FL pair, as well as the last layer. There was no parity.

Someone who knows math: what are the odds of skipping last slot, OLL, PLL, OLL parity, PLL parity, and AUF on a 4x4?
 
I just got a LS+LL skip with no AUF and no parity on a 4x4, and no, that's not a typo of any sort.

Someone who knows math: what are the odds of skipping last slot, OLL, PLL, OLL parity, PLL parity, and AUF on a 4x4?

Wow. That's pretty crazy!

The probability of skipping the last slot is 1/150. It's a 1/15 chance of the corner being solved and 1/10 chance of the edge being solved.

The probability of skipping last slot, OLL, PLL, OLL parity, PLL parity and AUF is 1 / (150 * 216 * 72 * 2 * 2 * 4) = 1 / 37,324,800

That's almost 3 times less likely than a lotto win in the UK. All things considered, I think I'd prefer the lotto win. :)
 
Lol I just got a LL skip on 4x4. I never got a 3x3 LL skip when I timed my solves, but I got it on 4x4. The chances of getting an LL skip is (LL skip on 3x3) * 4 right?
 
What is the probability that, after first 2 blocks of Roux, the F2L is completely solved?
What about if the centers are always oriented in the last move of F2B (i.e. D/U center on U)?
 
Back
Top