possible new BLD memo system?

caseyd

Regular
Joined
Mar 27, 2011
Messages
144
Location
PA
WCA ID
2011DECH01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Thinking of trying out this new memo system

Heres how it works
so each edge has a number associated with it ( 1 through 10 with exceptions of the piece in between the t perm swapped corners and the up front one, which I call straight ( who knows why)) ( havent tried corners)
each number has a person, a planet in the solar system ( place), and a verb

the people have first names with the first ten letters of the alphabet
the planets are in order from sun to pluto ( I dont care that son or pluto is not a planet)
and verbs work the same way as the names
this way you could make up sentences, and not have to make up words on the fly, I have a few successes with the edges, but still cant do the full thing blind, still working on that


any suggestions about this method?
 
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?785-Memory-Methods

PAO.

Imagery Systems:
PAO (or some breakdown of that)
Person, Action, Objects.

I know that Chris Brownlee uses a PO system
Joel van Noort is working on a PAO system as well.

Each location as a predefined set of images.
With a PAO system (the biggest system), there would be about 72 images. You would then use about 20 of those images to memorize the cube. These 20 or so images would be broken down into 7 key points.

A person (Michael Jordan)
An action (slam dunks)
An object (basketball) This could mean something to somebody with a PAO system.

Let's say that UR->UF->UB gives this story.
However ...
UF->UB->UR is the same net effect of the cycle, just memorized from the UF, this would actually result in a completely different blurb.

A person (Chris Hardwick)
An action (solves)
An object (rubik's cube)

Each of the 24 locations have a specific person, action, and object.

You memorize in this order.

P->A->O->P->A->O->P->A->O

You will never get the Action image of the UF if it's a 3n (where n is a whole number) piece in the cycle.
 
of like a memo thing? well I would make a sentence like caring about dan on the sun while juggling with hanna on saturn. this would mean 3 4 1 10 8 7 and Then I would cycle those pieces
 
That seems like more work then needed. If you're going to make a sentence you should be able to directly solve from that. You shouldn't have to use cryptography to get the numbers associated with the words. I think it adds unnecessary thinking.
 
for indirects methods as 3OP right?
I think a planet is much worse than anything else, cause I have never been to saturn
 
It´s not new.

When I started solving edges with M2, I used a similar system. I made a list of adjectives, persons, verbs and object, each from A to X, and built sentences with it (4 Pieces = 1 Sentence, so it´s good for M2, because I knew exactly if I did an odd or a pair number of M2s. ).
EricLimeback described this in his youtube tutorial (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snlPUuaAMD4, starting at 9:50)
He made the the example: LJQN -> Little John Quits Now.

I did it the same way, only in german.
 
Back
Top