POLL: How fast were you when you started learning full OLL/PLL?

How fast were you when you started learning full OLL/PLL?


  • Total voters
    87
I was serious about Corners first for a long time before I tried CFOP and knew CLL before OLL/PLL. I averaged around 18 seconds. Now I use Roux which felt like going back to my corners first method.
 
I started to slowly learn more PLL and OLL when I was at a minute or so. I knew full PLL by the time I was at ~30, and full OLL by the time I was at ~25. I was still using LBL-style F2L until I was sub22. :p
Terrible, I know, but back then I didn't have any help from anyone so I had no idea that F2L was more important than LL.
 
Last edited:
PLL's: started at maybe 40 seconds?
OLL: still learning, about halfway done, and I'm sub-30 right now.
 
I learned full PLL at about 45 seconds (yea quiet early but I figured why not learn soon and develop them to be as fast as possible and get use to recognizing them)
Right now i know about 2/3 OLL and im averaging around 23-25 seconds.
 
I never really set out to learn the full set; I just kept on picking up algs until I slowly realised that I could.
I was full PLL by about 40s; stopped learning algs for a month when I was about 2/3 OLL to concentrate on my times and hitting sub-30.
Haven't really timed myself much in a while but average high-20s.
 
Started PLL at around 40 and finished it at 30-25. Currently averaging 20 and I know a couple of OLLs (I'd guess around 15 although 7 of them will be part of 2-look) and not focussing on learning the rest yet.
 
Back
Top