petrus vs. roux or stay were i'm at

[riffz]

Petrus is pretty fast once you get the hang of it.
Check out some of Erik Johnson's videos.

Roux is pretty fast once you get the hang of it.
Check out some of Austin Moore's videos.

Lol

On a different note, though, if you aren't planning on changing your main method anyway, Petrus might prove to be useful if you want to get into FMC.

 

[Edward]

I think it's a good idea to learn any method. Learn them all in fact.

 

[Cubenovice]

I intend to learn as many as I can.

Not having a lot of time to practice this means that I am not really improving my times with my main method CFOP though.
But I don't care too much about that , I am having fun solving this great puzzle and that's what counts.

 

[nck]

I can solve using quite a number of methods, but i only practice cfop and rewks for speed.

 

[Cride5]

I would encourage learning them all, including the experimental ones ... this list should get you started

If you really want expand your cube knowledge though, I would recommend looking at different disciplines like BLD or FMC. Not only do these involve different methods, but they evoke a different way of thinking about the cube altogether.

 

[Sn0w]

Just wondering, someone from an earlier post, mentioned that Zz/Zb was up with Roux.

If roux is block building, that would make be partial intuitive, mainly excluding cmll. Then, of all cases and subs of ZZ, wouldn't that kind of make ZZ much more advanced, and slightly unrealistic? Also I kind of find EO + Line quite complicated, no?

 

[riffz]

Also I kind of find EO + Line quite complicated, no?

I think it takes a lot of practice to build EOLine efficiently, but I wouldn't call it "complicated".

 

[hawkmp4]

I wouldn't call ZB complicated. It's no more complicated than standard CFOP. Recognise case, apply algorithm. There's just more algorithms for ZB.

 

[uberCuber]

just noticed that this thread is a year and a half old :fp

and anyway, ZZ is not unrealistic at all

 

[iChanZer0]

ROUX