[WR] Oscar Roth Anderson - Pyraminx 3.43 avg

in the german forum they say you must be disqualified because you are not "fully dressed":
2h) Competitors must be fully dressed. Competitors may dress in jeans, pants, shorts, slacks, skirts, foot-wear, T-shirts or dress shirts. Hats may be worn. Clothes must not display vulgar language or have inappropriate pictures.
 
in the german forum they say you must be disqualified because you are not "fully dressed":
2h) Competitors must be fully dressed. Competitors may dress in jeans, pants, shorts, slacks, skirts, foot-wear, T-shirts or dress shirts. Hats may be worn. Clothes must not display vulgar language or have inappropriate pictures.

YEAH! It's obscene, he's practically naked! xD
 
in the german forum they say you must be disqualified because you are not "fully dressed":
2h) Competitors must be fully dressed. Competitors may dress in jeans, pants, shorts, slacks, skirts, foot-wear, T-shirts or dress shirts. Hats may be worn. Clothes must not display vulgar language or have inappropriate pictures.
Interesting, but I think it would be a shame if this rule was actually taken seriously.
We have a foot-solving category, so footwear should not be necessary unless the delegate or venue specifies such.
 
in the german forum they say you must be disqualified because you are not "fully dressed":
2h) Competitors must be fully dressed. Competitors may dress in jeans, pants, shorts, slacks, skirts, foot-wear, T-shirts or dress shirts. Hats may be worn. Clothes must not display vulgar language or have inappropriate pictures.

I want to see a feet-solver follow this rule lol...
 
'Competitors MAY dress in jeans, pants, shorts, slacks, skirts, foot-wear, T-shirts or dress shirts.'
I believe may is the key term. from WCA regs: 5. MAY This word, or the adjective "OPTIONAL", mean that an item is
truly optional.
 
Back
Top