Why would Per's cage method be worse for bigger cubes than the traditional centers first method ?Originally posted by CraigBouchard@Mar 22 2006, 11:16 PM
Gilles: Notice how it is exponential?!?!?!
Everyone else: It will be solved the same as any other puzzle bigger than 3x3...Centers, edges, solve as 3x3, as you get to bigger cubes you almost have to do this...Edges first starts to fail...And yes...I need one...
Yeah, I think you would be right if Per relied only on 3-cycles of single pieces to solve the center. But considering he doesn't 3-cycle single blocks all the time, he also cycles blocks of pieces, I think his method woudl still be very efficient.Originally posted by Scott@Mar 23 2006, 05:49 AM
because you'd have ALOT more center piece to work with i think, i dunno.