DevMelonCubing
Regular
well, I thought I'd just make a method to play around with, I'm not sure it's good for speedsloving, but it's an interesting method to say the least, I introduce you to Fortego! as told by my friend, it's similar to Doorspray, but it's not the same here is a basic desc. of it:
Fortego Method (OMOP+I) (This is now a WIP)
O: Ortega Face aka First Face (FF)
For this first step, you must make the first face, like in the Ortega 2x2 Method.
M: Middle Layer (ML)
For this step, you must make the middle layer by using insert algs, it can be advanced, or it can be the CFOP beginner inserts.
O: Orientate Top Layer (OTL)
For this step, you must do basically OLL, but since it isn’t the last layer that must be completed to solve it, it is called the Top Layer, hence OTL.
P+I: Permutate Both Top and Bottom Layers + In-between Parity Solving (PBTaBoL + IPS)
For this step, you must do T or Y Perm to almost finish or finish one layer, and in some cases, it may have Parity, there is a chance if you skip it and do the other, there will be a parity that will fix the other parity, or that layer that had the parity first will be solvable, if not, you will have to do PC (Parity Configuration) and might end in a OLL PLL. If you have no problem with PBTaBoL, you can do the last step of PLL and finish it.
Let me know your thoughts on it!
Fortego Method (OMOP+I) (This is now a WIP)
O: Ortega Face aka First Face (FF)
For this first step, you must make the first face, like in the Ortega 2x2 Method.
M: Middle Layer (ML)
For this step, you must make the middle layer by using insert algs, it can be advanced, or it can be the CFOP beginner inserts.
O: Orientate Top Layer (OTL)
For this step, you must do basically OLL, but since it isn’t the last layer that must be completed to solve it, it is called the Top Layer, hence OTL.
P+I: Permutate Both Top and Bottom Layers + In-between Parity Solving (PBTaBoL + IPS)
For this step, you must do T or Y Perm to almost finish or finish one layer, and in some cases, it may have Parity, there is a chance if you skip it and do the other, there will be a parity that will fix the other parity, or that layer that had the parity first will be solvable, if not, you will have to do PC (Parity Configuration) and might end in a OLL PLL. If you have no problem with PBTaBoL, you can do the last step of PLL and finish it.
Let me know your thoughts on it!
Last edited: