My 3x3 in 9.90 seconds video. The umm... "fake" one

[ben1996123]

I have the scramble... and solution...

The scramble - thanks to cube explorer - B2 U' B2 D2 R B2 D2 L2 D2 R2 U' R' B2 U' F' R2 F' U'

The solution -

Cross: Unsure - I checked the video carefully, and realised I had made mistakes on this part, but I am unsure of what it actually is.
F2L #1: Unsure
F2L #2: Unsure
F2L #3: U' R' U R U y L U L'
F2L #4: U2 y' R' U2 R U' R' U' R U' R' U R
OLL:
PLL: U' y x L2 D2 L' U' L D2 L' U L'

See? Now do you believe that it wasnt fake?

 

[4Chan]

Hey.... this seems awfully familiar....

Didnt Charlie post something about this a few months ago...
(searches...)

Yeah, thats you.
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?p=199879#post199879\

HAHA, NICE RECORDS.
0.16 2x2?!
HAHAH WAS IT A 2 MOVE SOLUTION?
YOURE NOT IMPRESSING ANYONE.

If this was some other forum, id tell you to gtfo nooblet

 

[StachuK1992]

See? Now do you believe that it wasnt fake?

No. I see the same thing as before.
A video, a scramble, and a solution.
Only this time, they were provided by you.

This thread should never have been made. you just made yourself a ditch.

 

[IamWEB]

Embedding disabled by request...

 

[ben1996123]

0.16 2x2?!
HAHAH WAS IT A 2 MOVE SOLUTION?
If this was some other forum, id tell you to gtfo nooblet

It was a 1 move solution... I was on an optimal scrambler and the scramble was U

 

[4Chan]

0.16 2x2?!
HAHAH WAS IT A 2 MOVE SOLUTION?
If this was some other forum, id tell you to gtfo nooblet

It was a 1 move solution... I was on an optimal scrambler and the scramble was U

:fp

And you had the audacity to consider that a solve.
Congratulations, you just took it on to a whole new level.

 

[JLarsen]

Lol you didn't have a single delay in the entire solve. You didn't have any reaction either. Any. None. Nice ditch you've dug though. Quite amusing. I'd like to see how far this goes now.

 

[ben1996123]

A bit pathetic, but I do agree, it is not really a solve, but since the scramble was U, It should be counted, I used the WCA scrambler.

 

[Sa967St]

I still call hacks

 

[Daniel Wu]

it is not really a solve

It should be counted

well...

 

[mcciff2112]

Lol, I think he seriously thought he could fool us by providing a solution. No solve has that easy of a cross, followed by that easy of a first insertion, followed by that easy of a second insertion, followed by your favorite F2L fingertrick, followed by an OLL skip. It just doesn't happen like that. Sorry

 

[Ethan Rosen]

As some of you (fazrulz) may know, I'm usually pretty skeptical, but I believe him, and I think some of you guys should back off and stop assuming people can't be luckier and better than you are.
Also, who gives a flying duck about 2x2 single?

 

[qqwref]

If you fill your signature with lucky single solve times, you have to expect that people are going to call you on it. I strongly suggest putting PB averages there instead (they'd give people a better representation of your skill) or at least nonlucky single times.


Also: after watching the video, I think your scramble and solution is wrong. Here's what I saw:

Scramble (yellow top, blue front): B U2 R2 D' U2 F2 U' L' B2 L' D L B2 L F2 R2 (16f*)
Double xcross: u U R'
F2L 3: U' R' U R U y L U L'
F2L 4: U2 y' R' U2 R U' R' U' R U' R' U R
OLL: (skipped)
PLL: U' y x L2 D2 L' U' L D2 L' U L'

33 move solve, pretty lucky if you ask me, but not necessarily fake.

 

[fanwuq]

LOLOLOLOL
Just because most of his records are claimed to be insanely lucky and his unlucky best single is sup-15.
Maybe I'm just unlucky. I can get at least one single better than his PB on hi-games.net every 5 solves, but I've yet to sub-11 any single, lucky or nonlucky.
I present several options:
1. He has no life and kept on scrambling to get really lucky scrambles
2. He is just lucky
3. He "generates" "scrambles."
4. Rehearsed solves.

No matter which option it is, it's insecure to claim lucky solves as PBs. Why not list your averages of 12?

 

[Tortin]

I still call hacks

Seconded.

Also, what exactly was the point of this thread? Why does it matter if other people think it's fake? If it's fake, it's fake. If it isn't, then it isn't. Other peoples' opinions aren't going to change that.

 

[foxdi]

If you fill your signature with lucky single solve times, you have to expect that people are going to call you on it. I strongly suggest putting PB averages there instead (they'd give people a better representation of your skill) or at least nonlucky single times.


Also: after watching the video, I think your scramble and solution is wrong. Here's what I saw:

Scramble (yellow top, blue front): B U2 R2 D' U2 F2 U' L' B2 L' D L B2 L F2 R2 (16f*)
Double xcross: u U R'
F2L 3: U' R' U R U y L U L'
F2L 4: U2 y' R' U2 R U' R' U' R U' R' U R
OLL: (skipped)
PLL: U' y x L2 D2 L' U' L D2 L' U L'

33 move solve, pretty lucky if you ask me, but not necessarily fake.

this is what i saw in the vids , :rolleyes: . it start with a u move .



but he provided the cross solution as
The solution -

Cross: L2 U2 R2


so who is lying

 

[mark3]

My only problem is that he rotates the cube a lot during F2L, more than most other 9.xx solves I've seen. It seems those would be rehearsed.

 

[Robert-Y]

I agree with Ethan and qq.

 

[Kian]

If you fill your signature with lucky single solve times, you have to expect that people are going to call you on it. I strongly suggest putting PB averages there instead (they'd give people a better representation of your skill) or at least nonlucky single times.


Also: after watching the video, I think your scramble and solution is wrong. Here's what I saw:

Scramble (yellow top, blue front): B U2 R2 D' U2 F2 U' L' B2 L' D L B2 L F2 R2 (16f*)
Double xcross: u U R'
F2L 3: U' R' U R U y L U L'
F2L 4: U2 y' R' U2 R U' R' U' R U' R' U R
OLL: (skipped)
PLL: U' y x L2 D2 L' U' L D2 L' U L'

33 move solve, pretty lucky if you ask me, but not necessarily fake.

No, but the zero recognition time for someone not terribly fast to begin with makes me very skeptical.

 

[anythingtwisty]

Hey guys, there's a reason it's called "lucky".