Method Neutrality Discussion/Comparison

StachuK1992

statue
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
3,812
Location
West Chester, PA
WCA ID
2008KORI02
YouTube
Visit Channel
Hello, all.

Basically, I want to see how neutral people are with various methods that are out there. I would like to see averages of 12, with whatever methods you know. Please do not post averages of:

-only 1 method. This gives me nothing to compare
-a method that you've yet to ever try. That's just silly
-a method that's so unused that I'll most likely have no one else to compare your times to
-less than 12. Averages of more than 12 would be appreciated, but averages under this lose their dependability very quickly.

For myself, I think that I am fairly method-neutral. These are my most recent averages of 12 with these methods:

CFOP/Fridrich-22.92
Roux-27.96
ZZ-27.99
Petrus-28.37
Salvia-30.71 ( I was really hoping for sub30 :p )

If at all possible, I'd appreciate it that, if you know all of these methods, you do them. Then, import them into any timer, such as qqTimer, and find the average average and the standard deviation.
For example, mine would be:
"current avg5: 28.11 (σ = 0.19)"

Thanks,
Stachu Korick
 
CFOP - 20.96
Petrus - 27.89
Roux - 35.81
Ortega - 51.70

NOTE: The CFOP & Petrus averages were just my most recent, not taken especially for this.
 
Last edited:
Fridrich- 21.43
Petrus- 23.60
Advanced Keyhole (I'm not explaining what I mean by this)- 24.74
Roux- 20.84
Ortega- 24.45
Waterman- 16.01

I practiced several methods before taking averages. I just took the best averages, except for the Waterman. That's just my most recent. I'd like to think I'm very method-neutral.
 
Fridrich with some COLL-EPLL and OLL-PLL.
session mean: 15.21
best time: 11.13 (PB non-lucky single, first solve of the day without warmup)
worst time: 18.22

Petrus with some COLL-EPLL and OLL-PLL.
session mean: 21.85
best time: 15.22
worst time: 28.34
 
Last edited:
Back
Top