ComputerGuy365
Member
Out of all people I would not expect him. Well, it's mainly the fault of the delegate. At least he came clean :L
that doesn't explain 23.80
That's obviously explained by HAVING HAPPENED EVEN BEFORE Maskow's issue. Stop being annoying.
That's obviously explained by HAVING HAPPENED EVEN BEFORE Maskow's issue. Stop being annoying.
I can definitely judge whether they did a fair job because it's public! All of us can see what was DNF'd and what wasn't.
yada yada yada
The stuff about Matyas doesn't matter. It's something totally different and I would appreciate it if you didn't use him as an example.
The point I was making was:
I don't really care anymore. Everyone seems to be being a jerk now, so whatever.
I fail to see how anyone is being a jerk. It would appear you have nothing left to say and are you using the "Everyones being mean to me!" card as a last resort.
Stefan Pochmann said I should said being annoying, which I never tried to be. Kit Clement, and I'm unsure of the word, but when I said: "The stuff about Matyas doesn't matter. It's something totally different and I would appreciate it if you didn't use him as an example." at the end of his message he said: "I'd appreciate it if you would make more informed posts that don't indirectly mock the people that give their own time into doing these investigations." which is basically just making fun of me by using the last line of my message.
I know it sounds like I have nothing left to say and using the everyone is being mean to me thing, but I just don't want to continue the argument.
This is getting pretty off topic, but Stefan Pochmann already explained why the 23.80 thing doesn't matter. And Kit Clement explained his side. So it's over.
Stefan Pochmann said I should said being annoying, which I never tried to be. Kit Clement, and I'm unsure of the word, but when I said: "The stuff about Matyas doesn't matter. It's something totally different and I would appreciate it if you didn't use him as an example." at the end of his message he said: "I'd appreciate it if you would make more informed posts that don't indirectly mock the people that give their own time into doing these investigations." which is basically just making fun of me by using the last line of my message.
I know it sounds like I have nothing left to say and using the everyone is being mean to me thing, but I just don't want to continue the argument.
This is getting pretty off topic, but Stefan Pochmann already explained why the 23.80 thing doesn't matter. And Kit Clement explained his side. So it's over.
THANK YOU. Someone gets it.
I don't really care anymore. Everyone seems to be being a jerk now, so whatever.
Let's just go back to being one big happy cubing family! We have the best community on the planet, and people are throwing it away like it is garbage over one world record holder, who still has more records that didn't get eliminated. There is still Feliks, Noah, Oliver, and many other cubers that are still fun to watch. Although Maskow was and still is my favorite MBLD solver, he should have known better. Please let's forget about this and not point fingers at each other and go back to happily cubing. Please?
Let's just go back to being one big happy cubing family! We have the best community on the planet, and people are throwing it away like it is garbage over one world record holder, who still has more records that didn't get eliminated. There is still Feliks, Noah, Oliver, and many other cubers that are still fun to watch. Although Maskow was and still is my favorite MBLD solver, he should have known better. Please let's forget about this and not point fingers at each other and go back to happily cubing. Please?
Finger pointing and stupid debates on speedsolving?! Never!
P.S.: random orientation sucks.
Yes, I know it's right to have the cube randomly oriented. My statement was to be read more like you would read "OLL parity sucks". It does, but we gotta deal with it.Otherwise I agree with your post but I don't understand why BLDers hate random orientation so much...
It is same situation for every solver so it is as fair as possible.
And it is by far the easiest way to guarantee fair circumstances to all solvers.
Also I like it because we use RANDOM scrambles and if you know where some stickers (center stickers in the case of orientation) will be before seeing the cube then the scramble is not truly random by strict definition.
In other words: I think orientating the cube by yourself is just a natural part of the solve and not some artificial hindrance put there only to annoy BLDers...
We don't let CFOPers to build their cross ready before they start the timer or Rouxers to build their first block before starting the timer so why should we let BLDers "solve" their centers before starting the timer?
Otherwise I agree with your post but I don't understand why BLDers hate random orientation so much...
It is same situation for every solver so it is as fair as possible.
And it is by far the easiest way to guarantee fair circumstances to all solvers.
Also I like it because we use RANDOM scrambles and if you know where some stickers (center stickers in the case of orientation) will be before seeing the cube then the scramble is not truly random by strict definition.
In other words: I think orientating the cube by yourself is just a natural part of the solve and not some artificial hindrance put there only to annoy BLDers...
We don't let CFOPers to build their cross ready before they start the timer or Rouxers to build their first block before starting the timer so why should we let BLDers "solve" their centers before starting the timer?
Lol you're new here. Don't worry, this is nothing.
We have the best community on the planet
and people are throwing it away like it is garbage over one world record holder, who still has more records that didn't get eliminated.
Stefan Pochmann said I should said being annoying, which I never tried to be.