Because I don't think there is any value of continuing the discussion after Luke apologised.
You keep missing my point.
For example,
Mr. A committed a crime, he finally admitted, and people said they will forgive him.
But these very people keep discussing/recreating the crime scene publicly,
showing everyone how Mr. A committed the crime.
Now.
Luke faked a solve/time, he finally admitted, and people said they will forgive him.
But these very people keep discussing/recreating the fake publicly,
showing everyone how Luke faked it.
To me this is not OK.
This is still shaming Luke.
This is being toxic.
And you people try to sugar coat it with "we are discussing the fact".
How not to be toxic:
1. Discuss the "fact" in a more private channel, without mention Luke's name.
2. Discuss the "fact" in another post without mention Luke's name.