Is it worth making new method?

[Real Life Cuber]

Is it worth making new methods. Can we beat cfop? Comment your ideas below.

 

[Pyjam]

Maybe you could add Roux, Petrus, and Others to your poll.

 

[Real Life Cuber]

Sorry I actually forgot to but meant to. I made a different one by accident, thought I was editing this one, and put in all other methods.

 

[TipsterTrickster]

If you first build 2 1x2x3 blocks (like roux) then insert the cross edges then oll and pll you have rouxFOP!

 

[Hazel]

If you first build 2 1x2x3 blocks (like roux) then insert the cross edges then oll and pll you have rouxFOP!

That method is widely considered to be worse than Roux or CFOP...

 

[JustinTimeCuber]

Or you could just use petrus

 

[applezfall]

or you could just use petrus

 

[FastCubeMaster]

Worth making a new method?

No

Unless it's fairly outstanding. You won't find much out there, that's not to say you should stop looking.

 

[Reed Merrill]

One cool thing is that totally new and unique methods aren't very common, but variations of existing methods are, and some of them are really cool. If you like trying new methods maybe give ZZ a shot, because there are a lot of really cool and really good variations out there, and some of them don't even require learning any (or at least not very many) new algs.

 

[Mastermind2368]

Make one? Yes. Make one without trying to know every concept out there? No! Don'tabout a method that is, "CFOP, but you do PLL alg, then a OLL and so you always get a PLL skip." or something like that.

 

[shadowslice e]

Tbh I do it because I find it fun. If I do happen across something that is be good I'll post about it

 

[mDiPalma]

yes and do it by hand