I'm officially crazy 2x2 LBL solves (I should seriously learn CLL or something)

[Curunír]

got insanely lucky today ao12 is 3.21
1. 4.15 U F' U2 R' U F' R F U'
2. 3.28 F' R' F' R2 F R' F' U R'
3. 3.07 F R2 F' R2 F R2 U' F R'
4. 2.68 U R U R' F2 U' F R' F
5. 2.73 R2 U R' F2 U' R F' U2 F
6. 2.86 U' R' F U' F U2 R F' U2
7. 2.90 R2 F' U2 R' F2 R U F2 R2
8. 3.79 R2 F U2 F U2 R U' F2 U2
9. (4.40) R F' U2 F' R2 F2 U R' U2
10. (2.30) U2 F' R' F2 U' R2 U2 F' R'
11. 4.27 U2 F' U F U2 R' F2 R U2 F'
12. 2.36 R' F' U' F2 R2 U' F' U2 F2
// and ao5 is
1. (3.07) F R2 F' R2 F R2 U' F R'
2. (2.68) U R U R' F2 U' F R' F
3. 2.73 R2 U R' F2 U' R F' U2 F
4. 2.86 U' R' F U' F U2 R F' U2
5. 2.90 R2 F' U2 R' F2 R U F2 R2
//all sub-3s except the 2.90 were 2-looked either by predicting OLL or getting a PLL skip
if I was ever going to buy a lottery ticket it would be today

 

[Curunír]

oh and for all the solves I used LBL

 

[Deleted member 36445]

learn ortega and see if you can break UWRs

 

[IsThatA4x4]

learn ortega and see if you can break UWRs

ortega UWRs?

 

[bldcuber314]

learn ortega and see if you can break UWRs

The official Ortega WR single is 0.43s...

 

[Deleted member 36445]

The official Ortega WR single is 0.43s...

no one care for 2x2 singles
change my mind

 

[JDAW6]

2.05
3.79
3.48
2.14
3.39
(1.37)
3.26
(6.89+)
3.94
2.33
3.13
3.05
ao12 3.05

lol I tried these scrams beacuase why not
and these scrams are amazing if you do LBL. I don’t so I failed but kudos to u

 

[Cuber Score]

Could you post a reconstruction of one of the solves?
I want to calculate your TPS because sub-3s on LBL are insane

 

[Bingus cuber]

I have multiple sub-3s on 2x2 and I use LBL. It's really about lucky scrams, good LL cases/skips, and efficient layers, not so much TPS.

 

[Curunír]

Could you post a reconstruction of one of the solves?
I want to calculate your TPS because sub-3s on LBL are insane

To be fair I'm using keyboard
I can do a reconstruction of you like

 

[randomness...]

well this is the exact reason I don't religiously practice 2x2 lol

 

[Garf]

well this is the exact reason I don't religiously practice 2x2 lol

Not 2x2 for me but 7x7. Yet I'm doing an ao1000.

 

[randomness...]

Not 2x2 for me but 7x7. Yet I'm doing an ao1000.

I'd gladly do anything more than a 3x3 lol

 

[Curunír]

Could you post a reconstruction of one of the solves?
I want to calculate your TPS because sub-3s on LBL are insane

4. 2.86 U' R' F U' F U2 R F' U2

inspection// Y' X2
layer// U L' U' L
OLL// U F R' F' R U R U' R'

btw I downsolved it to 1.27

 

[Curunír]

here is a fairly average solve for me
3.55 U' F2 R2 F R' U R2 F2 U2
inspection// Y X
layer// R2 U R U R'
OLL// U2 R U R' U' R' F R F'
PLL// R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U2

 

[JDAW6]

To be fair I'm using keyboard
I can do a reconstruction of you like

Oh! That makes sense without keyboard it’d probably be 0.3 - 0.5 slower

 

[bldcuber314]

Oh! That makes sense without keyboard it’d probably be 0.3 - 0.5 slower

Probably not that much but yeah.

 

[Curunír]

here is another ao5 (still using LBL)

Generated By csTimer on 2024-03-27
avg of 5: 2.91

Time List:
1. 3.59 R2 F2 U R' U' R' U2 F' U'
2. (DNF(1.43)) R U' F' R2 F U' F2 R' F2
3. 2.81 U F2 R F' R F2 U F R2
4. 2.32 F R' F' R F2 U' F R F
5. (1.41) U' F' R2 F R2 U' F' R' F'

The 5th solve has quite an interesting solution
inspection//X Y
Layer// R' F R U R U' R'
OLL// F R U R' U' F'
and the 3rd solve had a one move layer on orange
turns out 2nd solve was a misscramble

 

[Curunír]

The official Ortega WR single is 0.43s...

isn't it just a 4-mover which are intuitive anyway

 

[bldcuber314]

isn't it just a 4-mover which are intuitive anyway

Yeah what I was basically trying to say was that in 2x2 methods tend to overlap.