vcuber13
Member
i agree with andrew, i average 18 on 3x3 and 23 on sq1 i know about 10 eps 8 cps and 3 eos for sq1 and full pll and like 25 olls for 3x3. also ive spent a lot more time practicing 3x3
Here is the alg I use for Kite/Square
/(-1,0)/(2,0)/(-2,0)/(2,0)/(-1,0)/(-3,0)/
& mirrored
/(0,1)/(0,-2)/(0,2)/(0,-2)/(0,1)/(0,3)/
I find it a bit hard to believe that you can easily be as fast at sq-1 as you are at 3x3. Like, I avg 4x as much on sq-1.
Nice, site, though. :tu If I get more serious about sq-1, I'll know where to go.
You made a whole website devoted to square-1, cool, but hopefully you didn't spend money on it. How do you cut corners on a square-1, my pieces all fall out when i try (i have a cubetwist).
Recently, there has been a lot of controversy over the Cubetwist square-1 and the MF8 square-1. Personally, I recommend the MF8 square-1 because
a) it will improve your accuracy
b) it will get better as you do
and c) it doesn't pop.
My times at sq-1 and 3^3 are roughly the same. And I've already gotten sub-20 avgs of 5 at sq-1, at 3^3 my best are in the high 22s.I find it a bit hard to believe that you can easily be as fast at sq-1 as you are at 3x3. Like, I avg 4x as much on sq-1.
too shortYou should made shape using scallop-kite
Do not learn all EO, but instead learn the single swap, opp-opp swap and adj-adj swaps
learn all CO (Not many algs, and all easy to learn
Do not learn all EP algs. Instead learn adj parity, O perm (both cw and ccw), adj-adj, opp-opp, adj-opp, opp-adj, and H, Z and O-opp on top and bottom (all effectively MU algs). These are all easy algs and you can easily sub-20.
i dont agree with this, for the people of us who only know the basic eps, which is almost everyone, ep is kind of like cubeshape, you have to intuitively reduce the case to something like adj-adj which then leads to solved.This is particularly important for sq-1 because sq-1 is quite "alg-recog-alg-recog-alg" based compared to other puzzles after cubeshape.
i dont agree with this, for the people of us who only know the basic eps, which is almost everyone, ep is kind of like cubeshape, you have to intuitively reduce the case to something like adj-adj which then leads to solved.
i dont agree with this, for the people of us who only know the basic eps, which is almost everyone, ep is kind of like cubeshape, you have to intuitively reduce the case to something like adj-adj which then leads to solved.